Volltext anzeigen1 Seiten
Seite 1
Im PDF ansehen(öffnet in einem neuen Fenster)BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
16 yung 1973
ties, pose a special threat to the general
3 Baker,
B.,
de C., Golberg,
L
and Sait; JP, Jou
eriolo,
public.—I am, etc.,
R. G. HENDRICKSE
1961,”
+ British Medical Journal, 1960, 1, 788; ibid, 1961,
and Horning,
E
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
of ae and
453.
ournal
fationalLa Institute, 1960,
RE 109. i
Liverpool
Haddow,
the
Dukes, C. E., and
. C. V., British Journal of Cancer,
Sarcoma after Intramuscular Iron Injection
Sm—I read with interest the latest instalment from Messrs. A. E. Mackinnon and J.
Banceweicz in the long story of intramuscular
p
iron therapy and human cancer (5 May,
suggest, =
227). As the authors themselves
tumours at the
SSAV.A
.
Q
occurrence of the malignant
site of earlier injections of iron dextran may
be entirely fortuitous. I entirely agree with
this view and it is a pity that no
data were given that might lend support
to it, For example, one would like to
have some idea of the number of people
who have been treated with repeated intramuscular iron dextran and have not developed tumours. Those treated, say, 15
years ago would provide valuable dam in
this respect. One would also like to know the
incidence of sarcoma (or lack of it) at the
site of intramuscular injection of other types
of pharmaceutical preparations (such as insulin and penicillin). Admittedly, this information is not readily available, but one
would anticipate that hospital records would
provide valuable information of this sort.
Turning to the animal data, I feel that
the authors did not emphasize sufficiently
the importance of “iron overload” in the
„a Production of local sarcoma by iron dextran
ediinjections in rats and mice. The exhaustive
of Golberg and his colleagues!
54 (studies
leave little room for doubt that rumours de-
[re]
I
E veloped only in those animals
treated repeatedly with high doses (of the order of
0-5 ml in the rat and 0-2 ml in the mouse).
Lower doses, which were insufficient to produce an “iron overload,” did not produce
tumours. This is an important consideration
since the doses to the Auman are unlikely to
cause an “iron overload.”* In addition, it is
felt that insufficient attention has been given
to the “inon-laden” macrophages that have
been reported? by a number of workers in
the sarcomas produced by iron dextran in
rats and mice. In my view, their absence
from the human tumours studied by Messrs.
MacKinnon and Bancewicz merited some
comment.
With regard to the “distant” as opposed to
local rumours reported by Langvad,' I would
point out that these were reported only in
mice. In an earlier publication from this
institute? the reasons for interpreting with
caution the results of carcinogenicity tests in
mice have been discussed at length, so that
in my view there is no valid evidence that
iron dextran induced tumours at sites other
than the injection site in rodents.
I do feel that in any report of cases of
sarcomas arising at the sites of injection of
iron dextran—or other pharmaceutical preparations—it would be more helpful if
sufficient background data could be provided
to enable readers to place such reports in
their proper perspective.—I am, etc.,
PAUL GRASSO
British Industrial Biological Research Association
shalton, Surrey
L.«a Martin, L. E., and Smith, J. P.,
1 Golberg,
¿eo and Applied Pharmacology, han 2,
Biochemical Pharmacology, 1961, s, A
3 Gaber, de s Smith, J. P., and Baker,
B. de
a
J.
C,
British
pus of Conca,
À an
sa
8 Langrad,È A3,
Journalet È
L., Mitchley, B. C. V. sd Roe,
a
Crampton, R. F., Food and
Cosmetics
Tintcoloay,
1972, 10, 418.
type which in retrospect were diagnosed as
“most probably rabies.” All these patients
died, and all within 48 hours of being seen.
Quarantine practices and the control of
wild life are not easy in vast continents like
Asia, Africa, or America. Treatment of rabies
does not yet produce cure. I therefore plead
for more effort
by researchers
in the direction
of better and cheaper prophylaxis in the
meantime, while working towards a real cure
for this very real hazard to man.—I am, etc.,
Dozie IKEDIFE
Neurological Disease Associated with
Folate Deficiency
Sm,—Dr. E. H. Reynolds and his colleagues
(19 May, p. 398) cautiously suggest a causative role for folic acid in the develapment of
organic brain syndromes.
Ir seems to me that it is more likely that
the organic dementia is the cause of the deficiency. Certainly in the elderly folic acid
anaemia is not uncommon and certainly I
have been of the opinion that in many cases
an underlying dementia has led to the dietetic deficiency rather than the converse.—I
am, etc.,
P. W. Hurron
Sifnal, Salop
Mediterranean Anaemia in Antiquity
Sir—Dr. W. T. Menke (26 May, p. 489)
has convincingly demonstrated that the
manifestations
of
sickle-cell-thalassaemia
were observed by the writers of the Hippocratic corpus. It is possible to infer that the
Greeks before this time had also recognized
the ill effects due to the absence of glucose6-phosphate dehydrogenase, which is common among the peoples of the Mediterranean, conferring with it a protection against
falciparum malaria. Those with this enzyme
deficiency may develop acute haemolytic
episodes if they eat the broad bean (Vicia
faba) and this syndrome is termed favism
as a result.
Pythagoras is best remembered today for
the theorem which bears his name, but
among the peoples of antiquity he was renowned as a mystic who founded a religion
based chiefly on the tenets of the transmigration of souls and the sinfulness of
eating the broad bean.’ It may be that this
apparently eccentric prohibition was based
on observing the untoward effects which
followed in some of those who ate the bean
and that, like some of the other dietary restrictions which are incorporated into religious practices, it has a sound empirical
basis.—I am, etc.,
H. A. WALDRON
Birmingt
1 Russell, agprie of Western Philosophy, 2nd
edn.,
. London, Allen and Unwin, 1965.
Rabies
Sir,—Dr. A. D. Macrae’s review (10 March,
p. 604) of this topic makes interesting
reading.
Experience in the British Isles may make
it appear that rabies is “beaten.” In contrast,
in a Nigerian rural practice, which is not as
rich in population as in variety, in four and
a half years (July 1968-December 1972) I
have seen eight cases of classical rabies and
five other cases of encephalitis of uncertain
Ikedife Hospital
Nnewi, Nigeria.
Purpura Associated with Vomiting
Sir,—I was interested in the observations of
Dr, M. F. Burke and Dr. Janet M. Marks
(26 May, p. 488) on a case of purpura of
the head and neck associated with vomiting
in pregnancy.
They comment that purpura of this area
has been described in association with vomiting, quoting a 1972 source. I am surprised
this description in the literature is so recent,
for I have often observed purpura of the
head and neck following vomiting. I believe
the first time I noticed the association was
in one of my own children when she was
three years old, in 1962. The most recent
occasion was the day before I read your
correspondent's letter. I was on this occasion
invited to see a young woman who had an
attack of diarrhoea and vomiting. Her mother
pointed out to me that the girl had a rash,
thinking it might be some exanthem Examination revealed it to be a purpuric rash
of the head and neck only. Neither drug
nor pregnancy was involved, and I assume
that the aetiology of the rash is a sudden
rise in the venous and capillary pressure in
the head and neck caused by a rise in
intrathoracic pressure during vomiting.
I have, however, never seen such a rash
with eczematous features, as described by
your correspondents.—I am, etc.,
P. W. PITT
Dartford, Kent
Work Fit for a Consultant
Sir, —Before this correspondence is closed,
may I point out that according to Mr. J. P.
Turney (2 June, p. 555) his proposed
“specialist” (or permanent subconsultant)
will do more or less the same routine
work
and have the same responsibilities as a consultant. For this he will, quite reasonably,
get the same pay. But, in addition, he will
have a contractual obligation for emergencies and, when junior staff are scarce, will
be the first to forgo their assistanoe. If, as
well as all that, this busy, middle-aged
specialist is not allowed to do private practice or to be considered for a merit award, he
really will be exploited by the consultants
“with whom” (sic) he works.
Of course, if he can do private practice and
can get a merit award, it will be difficult to
distinguish him from a real consultant;
though with his title, no doubt the private
patients and the Advisory Committee on
Distinction Awards can be relied upon to
keep him in his proper station.—I am, etc.,
ROGER HOLE
Middlesbrough