Afficher le texte intégral3 pages
Page 1
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)Archaeological News
Author(s): William N. Bates
Reviewed work(s):
À 4 DO
TT
Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 22, No. 1 (Jan. - Mar., 1918), pp. 73-100
Published by: Archaeological Institute of America
Stable URL: http://www jstor.org/stable/497361
ta Lg _& 30
Accessed: 12/11/2012 06:14
Your usc of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://www jstor ore/page/info/aboul/policies/terms jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
aa
pneu
Archaeological Institute of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
American Journal of Archaeology.
STOR
i
http://www jstor org
This content downloaded by the authorized user from 192.168.52.73 on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 06:14:21 AM
AN use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Page 2
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)Irazy]
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCUSSIONS, 1919
At the opening of the fifth period (88-82 8.c.) the weight of the as was
reduced to half an uncia, and the relation of silver to bronze became 55: 1.
Within a few years the regular issue of bronze coins from the Roman mint
ceased until Augustus reorganized the coinage (20-15 B.c.).
But meanwhile half a dozen sporadic issues of bronze coins (46-20 B.c.)
in various places paved the way for the Augustan reform, and introduced the
use of orichalcum (copper and zinc with a trifle of lead) and of nearly pure
copper in coinage. Augustus proceeded to coin the sestertius and dupondius
in orichalcum and the as and quadrans in copper. The value of orichalcum in
relation to copper was 13:1; and a bimetallic principle was introduced into
Roman coinage. The normal weights of the new coins appear to have been
(in scripula) sestertius, 24; dupondius, 12; as, 10; quadrans, 25.
Origin of the Augustan Sestertius.—The late canon ARTHUR BEANLANDS
essayed to answer in an ingenious article (Num. Chron. 1918, pp. 187-204) a
number of puzzling questions regarding the nature and causes of the Augustan
reforms in coinage, and the reasons why it was not more permanent, and was
finally abandoned at about the end of the third century. It attempted to
arrest the depreciation in value of the as, and to stabilize money values, by
“an experiment in trimetallism,” whereby the relative value of copper to silver
should be maintained by the intervention of the coins of orichalcum, a metal of
then unknown constitution, good appearance and durability, and sufficient
rarity. It also aimed to make the Roman a satisfactory world-coinage. The
experiment was well-devised, and would probably have been successful, had
the government not ruined it by continued degradation of the denarius.
Messrs. SYDENHAM and 8. W. Smiru record their dissent from certain conclusions of the article.
Roman Legionary Coinage of Severus and Gallienus.—An article by C.
Oman (Num. Chron. 1918, pp. 80-96; pl.) does much to clarify knowledge of
the numbering and history of the Roman legions, and especially sets right
many errors due to blunders in the descriptions in Cohen of coins of the later
Roman emperors commemorating the legions. Fourteen of Cohen’s legionary
types are thus got rid of. Incidentally the author remarks that Cohen’s estimate of prices has no real relation to the rarity of the individual coins.
The Origin of the Libra.—In Rend. Acc. Lincei, XXVII, 1918, pp. 3-22,
Grurro De Perra, in discussing the oriental or Babylonian origin of the
Roman libra, with its characteristic prevalence of the numbers 12 and 24, goes
into the general question of the origin of the use of gold and silver as money,
the weights of various staters and minae, and traces the course of these
units, variously modified, through Lydia and Etruria to Rome.
GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS
The Subterranean Basilica near the Porta Maggiore.—In C. R. Acad. Insc.
1918, pp. 272-275 F. Cumont describes the underground basilica found almost
intact near the Porta Maggiore (A. J. A. XXIII, 1919, pp. 82 f.). It was
probably owned by the patron of the secret society which met in it. About
200 m. away there was a burial place for slaves of the gens Statilia, and it is
known that about 52 a.p. Statilius Taurus, at the instigation of Agrippina,
was accused of magicae superstitiones (Tac. Ann. XII, 59). The reference is
probably to the rites performed in this building. Cumont conjectures that
Page 3
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)430 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGY [Vor. XXIII, 1919
the society was a neo-Pythagorean association. See also C. Ricct, Rend.
Acc. Lincei, XXVII, 1918, pp. 23-24.
The Position of the Altar of Consus.—In B. Soc. Ant. Fr. 1917, pp. 165-168
(2 figs.) J. Formief points out that at one end of the circus at Arles there is
a horseshoe-shaped base decorated with sculptures, and in the circus at Dougga
in Tunisia a similar base bearing inscriptions. A vault below served as a support for small obelisks. In this base was a horseshoe-shaped room with the
curve facing the curved end of the circus. It was entered by a door in the flat
side which faced the spina. This peculiar feature was probably introduced in
imitation of the circus in Rome, and the altar of Consus, Formigé thinks, was
placed in this room. It was thus easily accessible and at the same time protected from injury from the racing horses and chariots.
The Origin of the Roman Forum.—In Class. Journ. XIV, 1918, pp. 433-440,
N. W. DeWrrr suggests on etymological, historical, and religious grounds, that
the Roman Forum was originally the private courtyard of the king, entered
through the Janus gate. (See also A. J. A. XXIII, 1919, p. 72.)
The Porticos of the Forum Holitorium.—In B. Com. Rom. XLV, 1917, pp.
168-192 R. LANCIANI discusses the topography of the porticos of the Forum
Holitorium and related questions.
The Gates of the Aurelian Wall.—In B. Com. Rom. XLV, 1917, pp. 193-217
L. Mariani gives an account of the recent changes in the gates of the Aurelian
wall made necessary by the growth of traffic. The Porta Lateranense was
enlarged by the addition of four simple arches newly broken into the wall.
The Porta Maggiore was restored to its former size by the reopening of two
ancient arches. Remains of paintings were found on the walls and vaults of
both of these. One set depicted garlands, vases, birds, etc., the other scenes
from the Pelops-Oenomaus myth arranged in zones. This last group covered
an earlier decoration of masks, festoons, etc. The paintings were probably
made when the arches had already been closed and converted into rooms of
some caupona. Besides opening up the side arches the administration also
removed the modern “diaphragms” which reduced the size of the central
arches, as well as some adjacent structures. The exterior of the Porta San
Lorenzo was left in the shape it had acquired in the Middle Ages, the interior
was restored as much as possible to its Augustan form. The base of what was
probably a Republican aedicula, remains of a mediaeval chapel with bits of
paintings of the tenth century, parts of walls, a well, ete., were discovered in the
course of the work. The Porta Pinciana was repaired where necessary but not
changed.
Domitian’s Villa in the Alban Hills.—The article on ‘Ancient Villas of the
Alban Hills before the Occupation by Domitian’ published by G. Lveu in
B. Com. Rom. for 1914 is followed ibid. XLV, 1917, pp. 29-78 by the same
author’s essay on ‘The Villa of Domitian on the Alban Hills. Part 1. General
Topography.’ He treats of the situation of the various parts of this massa
Caesariana, its plan, the probable architect, its relation to the Arx Albana, the
roads, aqueducts, historical memories of the place, the military guard, legal
questions connected with the inheritance of the estate, and the final fate of the
property. Part 2, on the central structures is promised.
The Jupiter of the Palatine.—In B. Com. Rom. XLV, 1917, pp. 79-92
Pietro RoMANELLI discusses the cult of Jupiter on the Palatine especially in