Afficher le texte intégral25 pages
Page 1
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)Aucun texte sur cette page.
Page 2
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)7KH5ROHRI0XVLFDO$QDORJLHVLQ1HZWRQV2SWLFDODQG
&RVPRORJLFDO:RUN
Niccolò Guicciardini
Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 74, Number 1, January 2013,
pp. 45-67 (Article)
3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI3HQQV\OYDQLD3UHVV
DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2013.0005
For additional information about this article
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jhi/summary/v074/74.1.guicciardini.html
Access provided by Koninklijke Bibliotheek-AFD (26 May 2015 09:52 GMT)
Page 3
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)The Role of Musical Analogies in Newton’s
Optical and Cosmological Work1
Niccolò Guicciardini
The ancient link between music and cosmology met with some success in
the Renaissance and early modern era. A complex range of factors led to
the resurfacing of the Neo-Pythagorean myth of the harmony of the celestial spheres. The importance of the notion of harmony and of musical theories on consonance during the scientific revolution has been emphasized by
historians such as Claude Palisca, Daniel P. Walker, Penelope Gouk, Paolo
Gozza, Floris Cohen, and Benjamin Wardhaugh.2 This is a complex and far
from linear history which cannot be regarded simply as a form of passive
adherence to Pythagoreanism. And while the topic cannot be explored in
the present paper, mention should nonetheless be made of the fact that
the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries witnessed what came to be
described as an ‘‘untuning of the sky.’’3 This consisted in the progressive
I thank my colleague Richard Davies for assistance with language. Thanks also to
Michel Blay, Michela Malpangotto, Alain Albouy, and to the other seminar participants
at the Observatoire de Paris for their comments on a preliminary version of this paper.
2
Claude V. Palisca, Humanism in Italian Renaissance Musical Thought (New Haven:
Yale University Press, 1985); Daniel P. Walker, Music, Spirit and Language in the Renaissance (London: Variorum, 1985); Penelope Gouk, Music, Science and Natural Magic in
Seventeenth-Century England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999); Paolo Gozza,
ed., Number to Sound: The Musical Way to the Scientific Revolution (Dordrecht: Kluwer,
2000); Floris H. Cohen, Quantifying Music: The Science of Music at the First Stage of
the Scientific Revolution, 1580–1650 (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1984); Benjamin Wardhaugh,
Music, Experiment and Mathematics in England, 1653–1705 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).
3
For a study of the complex interactions between music theory, philosophy, and mathe1
Copyright by Journal of the History of Ideas, Volume 74, Number 1 (January 2013)
45
................. 18340$
PAGE 45
12-20-12 12:29:11
Page 4
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)collapse of the belief, held by some Renaissance thinkers, concerning the
possibility of interpreting non-musical phenomena such as the structure of
the heavens, that of the human body, the medicinal virtues of drugs, and
architecture in terms of musical harmonies. This belief was gradually
replaced over the course of the late fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth centuries by the view of harmony typical of mechanical philosophy, which saw
it as a phenomenon to be studied in terms of the vibration of bodies and
the physiology of hearing.
As in the case of alchemy, Isaac Newton occupies a problematic position in this context. Scholars of Newtonian alchemy in the 1970s and 1980s
engaged in a lively debate: for some, Newton shared the mystical ethos of
natural magic which was a defining feature of, say, the Paracelsian tradition; according to others, Newton’s alchemy was nothing but rational
proto-chemistry.4 Only recently has the interpretation of Newtonian
alchemical manuscripts led to more balanced and better contextualized
readings.5
It should be said that it is far from easy to define just what we mean by
Neo-Pythagoreanism. Not only does this category resist pigeon-holing, but
the leading figures we can include in the Neo-Pythagorean tradition often
matical practice in the Renaissance, see Ann E. Moyer, Musica Scientia: Musical Scholarship in the Italian Renaissance (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).
4
The early studies carried out in the 1670s and 1680s on Newton’s alchemy and Pythagoreanism owe much to books such as Frances A. Yates, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964); and Daniel P. Walker,
Spiritual and Demonic Magic from Ficino to Campanella (London: Warburg Institute,
1958). On the early debate concerning Newton, alchemy, and magic, I refer the reader to
a number of works. On Newton’s alchemy, see the groundbreaking Betty J. T. Dobbs, The
Foundations of Newton’s Alchemy, or ‘‘the Hunting of the Greene Lyon’’ (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1975); Karin Figala, ‘‘Newton as Alchemist,’’ History of
Science 15 (1977): 102–37; and Figala, ‘‘Zwei Londoner Alchemisten um 1700: Sir Isaac
Newton und Cleidophorus Mystagogus,’’ Physis 18 (1976): 245–73. On Newton’s adherence to the myth of an ancient wisdom, see the pioneering paper by James E. McGuire
and Piyo M. Rattansi, ‘‘Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan,’ ’’ Notes and Records of the Royal
Society 21 (1966): 108–43; and for a critical appraisal Paolo Casini, ‘‘Newton, gli Scolii
classici: presentazione, testo inedito e note,’’ Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana 60
(1981): 7–53, translated in History of Science 22 (1984): 1–58. The author is deeply
indebted to the above-mentioned works that form an indispensable background for the
results presented in this paper.
5
For an overview, see William R. Newman, ‘‘The Background to Newton’s Chymistry,’’
in The Cambridge Companion to Newton, ed. I. Bernard Cohen and George E. Smith
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 138–73; and Newman, ‘‘What Have We
Learned from the Recent Historiography of Alchemy?’’ Isis 102 (2011): 313–21. For a
different view see Brian Vickers, ‘‘The ‘New Historiography’ and the Limits of Alchemy,’’
Annals of Science 65 (2008): 127–56; and the reply from Newman, ‘‘Brian Vickers on
Alchemy and the Occult: A Response,’’ Perspectives on Science 17 (2009): 482–506.
46
................. 18340$
PAGE 46
12-20-12 12:29:12
Page 5
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)interpreted it in contrasting ways (suffice it to recall the polemical exchange
between Robert Fludd and Kepler). For the sake of convenience, we might
want to set out from the description of the ‘‘Pythagorean view’’ provided
by Charles H. Kahn, who argues that Pythagoreanism may be traced back
to two ‘‘clusters of ideas.’’6 The first is presented in Plato’s Phaedo, Epinomis, Republic and Phaedrus; it concerns the immortality of the soul, the
transmigration of souls, and the possibility of purifying oneself and attaining liberation from the cycle of rebirth by completely separating soul from
body. The second cluster is presented in another great Platonic dialogue
and concerns cosmogony. In Timaeus one is presented with the notion that
the world soul is structured according to musical harmonies, while the body
of the cosmos is based on the five perfect solids.7 As is well known, the
Timaeus was often read as a Pythagorean dialogue. Proclus, in his highly
influential commentary on Euclid—which Kepler often cited—opted for
geometry, rather than arithmetic, as the chief Pythagorean mathematical
doctrine and interpreted Euclid as a Platonist who had given pride of place
to the Platonic five perfect solids.8 Some Christian authors, from antiquity
down to the seventeenth century, mused on the idea that the Universe and
man are the outward expression of the nature of the Creator who has
forged them according to mathematical (arithmetical and/or geometrical)
proportions and musical harmonies. The names of Cusanus and Kepler
come immediately to mind. I will leave the first cluster aside in this paper.
But let us turn to the second cluster of ideas presented through the mythological language of the Timaeus. This would seem like a more promising
direction, which might enable us to view Newton as a late spokesman for
the myth of celestial harmonies that had been revamped in the Renaissance.
As I mentioned at the beginning of this paper, the situation is rather
problematic. Certain aspects of Newton’s thought concerning sound, harmony, and musical theory would seem to be perfectly in line with the positivist view of him as a scientist removed from any mystical works, in the
vein of John Dee or Fludd. Take, for instance, Newton’s early studies on
the tuning of the musical scale, where he considered both just intonation
and equal temperament. In these studies, as Peter Pesic observes, empirical
considerations on the pleasantness of sound outweigh the kind of numerical
considerations typical of the Pythagorean tradition. Evidence is provided in
Charles H. Kahn, Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2001), 3–4.
Plato, Timaeus, 34c–36d, 42e–44e, 47c–47e, 52e–55c; Epinomis, 982e–983c; Republic
617a–617b.
8
See Dominic J. O’Meara, Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late
Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 179–81, 166–75.
6
7
47
................. 18340$
PAGE 47
12-20-12 12:29:12
Page 6
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)the manuscript ‘‘Of Musick’’ (1665), where Newton seems more interested
in experimentally researching the way in which the human ear discerns
‘‘sweetnesse,’’ ‘‘harshnesse,’’ and ‘‘grace,’’ than in the abstract numerology
of consonance typical of the Pythagorean tradition, even in its ‘‘moderate’’
Boethian version. Newton goes so far as to accept semitones and even
quarter-tones, something hardly acceptable to Pythagorean music theorists,
provided they are ‘‘passed over very hastily wth a larger stay upon ye concords twixt wch they are,’’ in which case, he claims, they ‘‘might bee
delightful.’’9 For another, better known, example of Newton’s scientific
approach to sound, one might refer to the theoretical research and experimental work concerning the speed of sound propagation he published in
section VIII, book II of the Principia.10 Other aspects of Newton’s reflections on music, however, will strike us as reformulations of themes typical
of the Neo-Pythagorean tradition; so much so that Gouk, in a nuanced and
perceptive analysis, has dubbed Newton a ‘‘Pythagorean magus’’ of sorts.11
Gouk’s reading of Newton as belonging to the Neo-Pythagorean tradition
has been recently endorsed by Pesic and Wardhaugh, while in his recent
learned study Olivier Darrigol refers in passing to Newton’s Pythagoreanism and seems to cite Gouk’s thesis with approval.12
Gouk’s claim is based on two sources. The first is a passage from ‘‘An
Hypothesis explaining the Properties of Light discoursed of in my severall
Papers’’ (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Hypothesis’’), in which Newton draws
an analogy between the musical scale and the prismatic color spectrum (see
fig. 1).13 This famous essay was originally written in 1672 as a reply to
C.U.L. MS Add. 4000, f. 139; edited in Peter Pesic, ‘‘Isaac Newton and the Mystery of
the Major Sixth: A Transcription of His Manuscript ‘Of Musick’ with Commentary,’’
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 31 (2006): 299–303.
10
Isaac Newton, The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans.
I. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999),
762–78.
11
Penelope Gouk, ‘‘The Harmonic Roots of Newtonian Science,’’ in Let Newton Be! A
New Perspective on his Life and Works, ed. John Fauvel et al. (Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 1988), 101–25; see also ‘‘Isaac Newton, Pythagorean Magus,’’ in Gouk, Music,
224–57.
12
Pesic, ‘‘Mystery of the Major Sixth’’; Wardhaugh, Music, Experiment and Mathematics, 120–25; Olivier Darrigol, ‘‘The Analogy between Light and Sound in the History of
Optics from the Ancient Greeks to Isaac Newton, Part 2,’’ Centaurus 52 (2010): 230–41.
13
In the spring of 1672 Newton set out to write his ‘‘An Hypothesis Hinted at for Explicating All the Afforesaid Properties of Light’’ (C.U.L. MS Add. 3970, ff. 433–34, 519–28)
as a reply to Hooke’s letter of 15 February 1671/2. Isaac Newton, The Correspondence
of Isaac Newton, 7 vols., ed. H. W. Turnbull, J. F. Scott, A. Rupert Hall, and Laura
Tilling [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959–77], 1:110–14). He later
reworked and sent it, together with another manuscript sometimes called ‘‘Discourse of
Observations,’’ to the Secretary of the Royal Society, Henry (Heinrich) Oldenburg, on 7
9
48
................. 18340$
PAGE 48
12-20-12 12:29:13
Page 7
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)FIGURE 1. Analogy between the prismatic spectrum
and the musical scale (a Dorian mode equivalent to
playing the white notes on a piano keyboard from
D to d), from the ‘‘Hypothesis’’ (1675). The reader
who is not familiar with the solfège system in use in
Newton’s England should ignore the notes written
on the right. Source: Newton, Correspondence, 1,
377.
Robert Hooke, and later, in December 1675, re-elaborated and sent by
Newton to Henry (Heinrich) Oldenburg, the Secretary of the Royal Society.
Some of the ideas of the ‘‘Hypothesis,’’ including the musical scale/color
spectrum analogy, are still to be found in the Opticks. The second text
is the so-called Classical Scholia, most probably penned in 1693–94 and
consisting of additions Newton planned to include in his second edition of
the Principia. Here Newton refers to Pythagoras as an ancient sage who
couched his knowledge of natural laws, including universal gravitation, in
musical terms.14
December 1675 (Newton, Correspondence, 1:362–86). See also Newton to Oldenburg,
11 June 1672 (ibid., 1:171–88), where some ideas of the ‘‘Hypothesis’’ are referred to.
14
There are several copies of the Classical Scholia in Newton’s hand: in the Royal Society
(MS Gregory 247, ff. 6, 8–9, 10–14 recto and verso) and in the Cambridge University
Library (C.U.L. MS Add. 3965.11, ff. 268r–69v, 270r, 272r, 277r–78v and 3965.17, f.
640r–640v). Two scholia found in a copy of the Principia belonging to Newton (now in
the Cambridge University Library, Adv. b. 39. 1) have been edited in Isaac Newton,
Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica: The Third Edition (1726), with Variant
49
................. 18340$
PAGE 49
12-20-12 12:29:26
Page 8
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)I believe it is unwarranted to use these two sources to reach a hasty
conclusion regarding Newton’s Neo-Pythagoreanism. The main thesis of
my paper can be summarized as follows. I will attempt to place the above
two allegedly ‘‘Pythagorean’’ loci in context. I will claim that what Newton
had in mind in the first case was an analogy between hearing and vision,
rather than an analogy between musical and natural phenomena, whereas
in the second case he depicted Pythagoras as concealing his knowledge of
gravitation theory behind musical analogies, without any commitment to a
conception of the world as ordered according to musical harmonies.
No doubt, Newton appears to be rather fascinated by the possible relation between results regarding the tuning of the musical scale and the subdivision of the prismatic spectrum; and in the Classical Scholia he refers
reverently to Pythagoras as a wise man who possessed knowledge of the
theory of gravitation. Still, this does not make Newton a Neo-Pythagorean
or a spokesman for the union between musical harmonies and the structure
of the cosmos along the lines of Plato’s Timaeus, even if certain sections of
the Newtonian corpus certainly appear to suggest that their author
embraced the concept of the harmony of the cosmos and nature, especially
where he refers to the ‘‘analogy of nature’’ as a guiding principle in his
research on the perception of light and sound.15
We should note right form the start that in the mid-1680s Newton
realized that the universe cannot straightforwardly be described as ‘‘harmonic.’’ While it is certainly governed by mathematical laws, these engender phenomena which are subject to deviations from any laws that might
help describe them in mathematically simple terms. Most notably, Kepler’s
‘‘harmonic’’ third law of planetary motion has to be adjusted for two bodReadings, 2 vols., ed. Alexandre Koyré and I. Bernard Cohen (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1972), 2:803–7. An English translation of the Classical Scholia with an
extensive commentary can be found in McGuire and Rattansi, ‘‘Newton and the ‘Pipes
of Pan,’ ’’ 108–43; for an edition and commentary on the Latin text see Casini, ‘‘Newton,
gli Scolii classici.’’ A thorough edition with variants can be found in Volkmar Schüller,
‘‘Newton’s Scholia from David Gregory’s Estate on the Propositions IV through IX Book
III of his Principia,’’ in Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant: Philosophy and Science in
the Eighteenth Century, ed. Wolfgang Lefèvre (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001), 213–65. David
Gregory first anonymously summarized the content of Newton’s Classical Scholia in the
‘‘Praefatio’’ to Astronomiae Physicae & Geometricae Elementa (Oxford: Theatro Sheldoniano, 1702).
15
Shapiro notes this in Isaac Newton, The Optical Papers of Isaac Newton, vol. 1, The
Optical Lectures, 1670–1672, ed. Alan E. Shapiro (Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1984), 547. See Newton’s ‘‘Hypothesis,’’ C.U.L. MS Add. 3970, f. 544r Newton, Correspndence, 1:376; and Newton to John Harrington, 30 May 1698, in ibid.,
4:275.
50
................. 18340$
PAGE 50
12-20-12 12:29:27
Page 9
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)ies in gravitational interaction and has to be abandoned for more than two
bodies. One of the great achievements of the Principia is the proof that
Kepler’s laws hold only approximately for the planets orbiting the sun. As
Newton wrote in a preliminary version of his Principia in 1684:
By reason of the deviation of the Sun from the center of gravity,
the centripetal force does not always tend to that immobile center,
and hence the planets neither move exactly in ellipses nor revolve
twice in the same orbit. Each time a planet revolves it traces a fresh
orbit, as in the motion of the Moon, and each orbit depends on
the combined motions of all the planets, not to mention the action
of all these on each other. But to consider simultaneously all these
causes of motion and to define these motions by exact laws admitting of easy calculation exceeds, if I am not mistaken, the force of
any human mind.16
Newton’s cosmos, moreover, is subject to the progressive dissipation of
motion (or kinetic energy, as we would say nowadays). In the universe
Newton describes in his Principia neither the planetary system nor the star
system has any stability. The ideas of the mathematical complexity and
dissipation of the motion of the heavens upheld by Newton after the mid1680s do not easily square with the concept of ‘‘celestial harmony.’’ This
notion of instability is important for Newtonian theology and Newton’s
view of the relation between God and nature. The latter, far from being
mathematically perfect, as Neo-Pythagoreans would have it, depends upon
God’s providence to maintain its stability. Were it not for God’s constant
intervention, or ‘‘reformation,’’ the fate of the universe would be chaos
and the progressive deterioration of ‘‘uniformity.’’17 For a Pythagorean like
Kepler, God is the craftsman who has created the world as harmonious
artefact: the world reveals geometrical and musical perfections. For a unitarian like Newton, the world would be unstable and doomed to corruption, were it not for God, the powerful restorer, who continuously reveals
His existence by providential intervention.
‘‘De motu sphaericorum corporum in fluidis’’ (December 1684?), Add 3965.7, f. 46v.
Isaac Newton, Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton: A Selection from the
Portsmouth Collection in the University Library Cambridge, ed. A. Rupert Hall and
Marie Boas Hall (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962), 256, 281. Page numbers refer to Latin and English translations, respectively, the latter altered along the lines
suggested by Curtis Wilson and George Smith.
17
See Isaac Newton, Opticks, or a Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections &
Colours of Light, rev. ed. (New York: Dover, 1979/1952), 402.
16
51
................. 18340$
PAGE 51
12-20-12 12:29:27
Page 10
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)As already noted above, it can hardly be denied that Newton was
rather fascinated by the idea that musical harmonies are concealed within
optical phenomena. Through a problematic enumeration of the colors of
the spectrum, he isolated seven of them—exactly the number of notes on
the musical scale. In his Lucasian lectures (Lectio I [1670]) Newton identified only five colors, but then around 1672 (Opticae pars II [1672]),
through the addition of orange and indigo, he reached the number seven, a
result which appears to have been in part designed to draw an analogy
between light and sound.18 In the eleventh lecture of his Opticae pars II
(late 1672) Newton recounts how by observation ‘‘everything appeared just
as if the parts of the image occupied by the colors were proportional to a
string divided so it would cause the individual degrees of the octave to
sound.’’19 This idea can also be found in the ‘‘Hypothesis,’’ both in the draft
of 1672 and in the version sent to Oldenburg in 1675. Newton (see figure
1) superimposed a monochord to the color spectrum projected by a glass
prism and claimed that the seven colors appear in correspondence with the
division of the monochord into seven notes. In the Optica Newton considered both an equal tempered scale and a scale tuned according to just intonation, and admitted that ‘‘such quite minute differences’’ between the two
scales ‘‘can produce errors hardly visible to the keenest judge.’’20 Newton
concluded that the best fit is given by choosing the ‘‘Dorian mode.’’ This
particular ‘‘mode,’’ or scale, is obtained by playing the white notes on a
piano keyboard from D to d. This mode has a particularly pleasing mathematical symmetry since the scale is a palindrome proceeding by a tone, a
semitone, a tone, a tone, a tone, a semitone, a tone.21 Gouk and Pesic claim
that with this analogy between the color spectrum and the musical scale
Newton was paying homage to Pythagoreanism. But if we take account of
the context in which this daring analogy was first proposed, we shall soon
realize that Newton set out from a ‘‘mechanical’’ hypothesis regarding the
analogy between auditory and visual perception, which he later played
Newton, Optical Lectures, 50, 542, 546.
Ibid., 543.
20
Ibid., 545. A detailed study of Newton’s observations on the subdivision of colors in
the spectrum and of the correspondence between colors and the scale is David Topper,
‘‘Newton on the Number of Colours in the Spectrum,’’ Studies in History and Philosophy
of Science 21 (1990): 269–79.
21
On musical theories in antiquity see Andrew Barker, Greek Musical Writings, vol. 2,
Harmonic and Acoustic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989). For an
introduction to temperament see James Murray Barbour, Tuning and Temperament: A
Historical Survey (1951; repr., East Lansing: Michigan State College Press, 1972). The
English context is studied in Benjamin Wardhaugh, Music, Experiment and Mathematics.
18
19
52
................. 18340$
PAGE 52
12-20-12 12:29:28
Page 11
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)down. Indeed, Newton quite early on in his life showed a strong interest in
perception, especially visual perception, an interest that was related to
broad-ranging questions and anxieties of his concerning the relationships
between soul and body.22
In his ‘‘Hypothesis’’ (both in the draft of 1672 and in the final version
of 1675) Newton is interested in perception, and especially in the analogies
between hearing and vision, on which he had already dwelt in 1665–66.
Indeed, as Pesic has shown, as early as 1665 Newton had examined the
relations between visual and auditory perception by focusing on the physical effects of vibrations on optic and acoustic nerves, making them pleasant
or unpleasant. Further, the analogy between hearing and vision, and the
theory according to which visual sensation is carried by vibrations of a
‘‘pure transparent liquor passing from the eye to the sensorium,’’ can be
found in the 1666 manuscript ‘‘Of Colours.’’23 Newton’s working hypothesis concerning perception is that the sense organs are stimulated by material
bodies which excite vibrations in an elastic medium contained in the nerves.
These ether-vibrations are transmitted to the sensorium. Newton claims
that since both sound and light are perceived through the propagation of
the vibrations of the ethereal ‘‘animal spirit’’ found in acoustic and optical
nerves, it is only natural to ask oneself whether any analogy exists between
the two forms of perception. For instance, in his 1672 ‘‘Hypothesis’’ Newton writes that light corpuscules, by hitting the retina, produce ‘‘vibrations’’
in the ether which cross the optic nerve and reach the brain, where they
‘‘affect the soule with a sensation of various colours according to their various proportions, something after the manner that various sounds are produced by various proportions of the vibrations of the Air.’’24 Might the
origins of musical consonance shed light on those of ‘‘the harmony of some
colors’’? Still, in 1675, in the version sent to Oldenburg, Newton examines
this hypothesis, which he formulates with great caution:
. . . as the harmony & discord of Sounds proceed from the proportions of the aereall vibrations, so may the harmony of some colours, as of Golden & blew, & the discord of others, as of red &
blew proceed from the proportions of the æthereall. And possibly
See the commentary in James E. McGuire and Martin Tamny, Certain Philosophical
Questions: Newton’s Trinity Notebook (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983),
216–40.
23
See Newton, ‘‘Of Musick,’’ C.U.L. MS Add. 4000, f. 138, and C.U.L. MS Add. 3975,
ff. 19–20; discussed in Pesic, ‘‘Mystery of the Major Sixth,’’ 292, 299–300.
24
C.U.L. MS Add. 3970.3, f. 528v.
22
53
................. 18340$
PAGE 53
12-20-12 12:29:28
Page 12
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)colour may be distinguished into its principall Degrees, Red,
Orange, Yellow, Green, Blew, Indigo, and deep violett, on the same
ground, that Sound within an eighth is graduated into tones.25
As early as 1672, in his optical lectures, which deal with the analogy
between the musical scale and the color spectrum at length, Newton surmised that the ‘‘affinity’’ between ‘‘the outermost purple and red’’ is ‘‘analogous to the concordances of sounds’’ found between the ‘‘ends of the
octave (which can in a way be considered as unisons).’’26 The same idea is
present in the draft of the ‘‘Hypothesis’’ composed in 1672, where Newton
wrote,
To which end I would suppose the vibrations causing the deepest
scarlet to be to those causing the deepest violet as two to one; for
so there would be all that variety in colours wth wch in the compasse of an eighth is found in sounds & the reasons why the
extreames of colours Purple & scarlet resemble one another would
be the same that causes Octaves (the extreames of sounds) to have
in some measure the nature of unisons.27
Newton, however, soon realized that he had to downplay the above analogy by noting that the ratio 2 to 1 for the extreme colors of the spectrum
(the ‘‘deepest violet’’ and the ‘‘deepest scarlet’’) did not occur. Indeed, in an
‘‘Observation’’ in his draft ‘‘Hypothesis’’ Newton obtains a ratio greater
than 3 to 2 (a fifth) but smaller than 5 to 3 (a major sixth in just intonation):
his preferred estimate is the ratio 14 to 9.28 Note that 14/9 艐 1.56 is a value
in-between a fifth and a sixth. The fifth is 3/2 1.5, the major sixth in
Pythagorean intonation corresponds to a ratio 27/16 艐 1.69, while in just
intonation it is 5/3 艐 1.67.
But how could Newton determine the ‘‘bigness,’’ ‘‘depth,’’ or ‘‘thickness’’ (or as we would say, the wavelength) of the vibrations? One should
note that Newton, with the word ‘‘bigness,’’ denoted both amplitude and
wavelength, the assumption being that these two magnitudes are correlated
Newton, Correspondence, 1:376.
See Opticae pars II (late 1672), in Newton, Optical Lectures, 544–46.
27
C.U.L. MS Add. 3970. f. 528v; cited by Shapiro in ibid., 546n.
28
The ratio for the extreme colors of the spectrum was found to be ‘‘greater than 3 to
2 & lesse then 5 to 3. By the most of my observations it was 9 to 14 [read 14 to 9].’’
C.U.L. MS Add 3970, f. 521v; discussed in Pesic, ‘‘Mystery of the Major Sixth,’’ 296;
Shapiro in Newton, Optical Lectures, 547n.
25
26
54
................. 18340$
PAGE 54
12-20-12 12:29:29
Page 13
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)in such a way that a larger amplitude is associated with a longer wavelength. Therefore, the reader should be warned that my usage of terms such
as ‘‘frequency’’ and ‘‘wavelength’’ below is anachronistic. As Michel Blay
and Olivier Darrigol show, for Newton wavelength was not a purely mathematical characteristics of the ether waves; rather, he understood it as correlated to the ‘‘strength,’’ magnitude,’’ or ‘‘vigour’’ of a ray. Since red is
‘‘stronger’’ than blue, presumably because it is carried by bigger corpuscles,
the waves associated with red are ‘‘bigger’’ in both amplitude and wavelength than those associated with blue.29 It is through his celebrated study
of ‘‘rings’’ (see figures 2 and 3) that Newton managed to match each color
to the wavelength of the ethereal vibration associated with it, as I shall
briefly explain below.
In the early 1670s Newton had the intuition to study mathematically
the formation of interference patterns in thin films, a phenomenon already
observed by Robert Boyle and Hooke, by adopting an experimental
approach that was most suited for quantification. Newton placed a spherical lens upon a flat glass surface in such a way as to create a thin layer of
air between the two pieces of glass (figure 3). When the sun shone on this
device from above, he noticed the formation of colored rings. When monochromatic light is used in this experiment, clearly spaced-out rings emerge,
as shown in figure 2.
Through a simple calculation, Newton showed how thickness d of the
layer of air between the two glass surfaces was a function of diameter D of
the rings (d 艐 D2/8R), where R is the radius of the spherical lens (see figure
3). This formula enabled Newton to show how the rings would form at
integral multiples of an elementary thickness of the layer of air. The conclusion he reached was that this elementary length coincides with the length
of the ‘‘pulse’’ of a vibrating ethereal medium. For example, in the case of
yellow the length of the pulsation would be 1/80,000 of an inch.
We should bear in mind that Newton was a corpuscularist, although
he proposed corpuscularism in a guarded manner—if I may put it so—as
See Newton, Correspondence, 1:376. See Michel Blay, ‘‘Une clarification dans le
domain de l’optique physique: bigness et promptitude,’’ Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 33
(1980): 215–24. Here refer to Darrigol, ‘‘Analogy,’’ 234. Newton draws a comparison
between the ‘‘small bodies’’ composing the rays of light impinging on ‘‘refracting or
reflecting superficies’’ and stones hitting the surface of water in ‘‘Mr Isaac Newtons
Answer to Some Considerations upon His Doctrine of Light and Colors,’’ Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society of London 88 (1672): 5087, reprinted in I. Bernard
Cohen and Robert E. Shofield, eds., Isaac Newton’s Papers and Letters on Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958), 119.
29
55
................. 18340$
PAGE 55
12-20-12 12:29:29
Page 14
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)FIGURE 2. Rings produced by monochromatic light striking Newton’s
experimental device, as described in this article. Source: author’s photograph.
far as the nature of light was concerned. Still, in the 1670s he combined
corpuscularism with the idea of luminous ethereal waves. According to
Newton, the phenomena Hooke had observed in the case of thin films (soap
bubbles, mica, etc.) and described in his Micrographia could be explained
by attributing periodic properties to light, an idea which supporters of the
wave theory ought to have found it easier to justify than did Newton himself. According to Newton, when corpuscles meet the surface separating
two transparent media with different refractive indexes, they send vibrations through the optical ether, which explain the periodicities observed in
interference phenomena such as the formation of Newton’s rings. What is
noteworthy here is that Newton associated a wavelength of the ether vibration with each color. In the 1690s Newton avoided committing himself to
the hypothesis of the ether, and he reformulated this ingenious idea of a
56
................. 18340$
PAGE 56
12-20-12 12:29:55
Page 15
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)FIGURE 3. A spherical lens ABC with radius R is placed on a flat glass
surface FBG. When it is lit from above, colored rings are formed (see
fig. 2). D is the diameter of one ring. Newton calculated the thickness
d of the layer of air between the lens and the glass plate in function of
D. Source: Compomat s.r.l. Niccolò Guicciardini.
combination of corpuscular and periodic properties of light by elaborating
his theory of ‘‘fits of easy reflexion and easy transmission.’’ According to
this theory, light rays find themselves in periodic ‘‘constitutions or states’’
whereby they are either reflected or transmitted by transparent media.
Newton called these periodic dispositions of the rays the ‘‘fits of easy
reflexion and easy transmission,’’ and the space interval between these dispositions the ‘‘interval of the fits’’: he claimed that this interval is characteristic of each color. Very much like his 1670s ether theory, this new
hypothesis accounted for the formation of rings. The theory of fits was
published by Newton in book II, part. III, props. 12–20 of the Opticks.30
For a detailed explanation of Newton’s theory of the interference of light and a description of his experiments with rings, the reader should consult Alan E. Shapiro, Fits, Passions, and Paroxysms: Physics, Method and Chemistry and Newton’s Theories of
Colored Bodies and Fits of Easy Reflection (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1993), 49–97, 136–207.
30
57
................. 18340$
PAGE 57
12-20-12 12:30:08
Page 16
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)In the 1670s, by resorting to his ether theory, and after briefly entertaining the hope that the ratio 2 to 1 would ensue for the elementary ether
vibrations relative to red and violet, Newton ascertained experimentally
that the ‘‘wavelengths’’ of the colors at the two ends of the prismatic spectrum are not marked by the the ratio 2 to 1 we would expect to find in the
interval of an octave. As noted above, the ratio between red and violet
rather appeared to be in-between 5/3 and 3/2, the ratio 14/9—which does
not correspond to any consonant musical interval—being often taken as
the best estimate. Newton’s subsequent experiments on interference of light
via the observation of rings most often yelded the value 14/9 艐 1.56, which
is the value cited in the Opticks.31 In other words, Newton, a careful experimental researcher and mathematician, tested a hypothesis regarding the
physiology of perception and reached a problematic result.
Newton’s adherence to the musical scale/color spectrum analogy resurfaces in his writings dating to the early 1690s, especially in drafts of what
was to become his celebrated Opticks. Here he most often confirms the
approximate ratio of 14/9 for the extreme colors of the spectrum. He also
affirms that a major sixth in just intonation would correspond to the ratio
of the ‘‘wavelengths’’ of the vibrations for red and violet that would be ‘‘in
the proportion of 5 to 3 to make the 5 principal colours red yellow green
blue violet answer to the tones in a sixth major.’’32 These results would
seem to spoil the analogy between the color spectrum and the octave. Yet
in his drafts for a projected fourth book of the Opticks, Newton reinterpreted his experimental results by taking recourse to a numerical operation applied to the ratios of the musical scale. This numerical operation
first appears in a draft of proposition 15 and in the addition to the conclusion of book 4, part 1, obs. 8.33 Newton was evidently pleased with this
idea, so much so that he formulated it anew in book II of the Opticks as
follows (the ratios quoted by Newton below are those of the Dorian mode
according to just intonation):
But it agrees something better with the Observation to say, that
the thicknesses of the Air between the Glasses there, where the
Rings are successively made by the limits of the seven Colours,
Newton, Opticks, 210. For details, see Shapiro in Newton, Optical Lectures, 547n.
C.U.L., Ms. Add. 3970, f. 336r; discussed in Pesic, ‘‘Mystery of the Major Sixth,’’ 296;
this idea was restated in Newton, Opticks, 211–12.
33
C.U.L. MS Add. 3970, ff. 363r, 344; discussed in Shapiro, Fits, Passions, and Paroxysms, 192 n. 123.
31
32
58
................. 18340$
PAGE 58
12-20-12 12:30:08
Page 17
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet in order, are to one
another as the Cube Roots of the Squares of the eight lengths of a
Chord, which sound the Notes in an eighth, [ . . . ]; that is, as the
Cube Roots of the Squares of the Numbers, 1, 8/9, 5/6 , 3/4, 2/3 ,
3/5, 9/16, 1/2.34
By introducing the cube roots of the squares of the Dorian mode ratios, the
analogy with the octave would be preserved. For example, according to
Newton’s preferred measurement results, thicknesses d1 and d2 corresponding to deep violet and red are in a ratio d1/d2 艐 9/14 艐 0.64, which is close
to the cube root of the square of 1/2. Namely, (1/2)2/3 艐 0.63. The reader
should note that, according to measurements accepted today, deep violet
has wavelength 艐 400 nm and red 艐 650 nm, so that 40/65 艐 0.62. In his
fascinating article on the subject, Pesic is certainly right in drawing attention to the trick Newton devised, for while the latter pushed things a little—
considering the arbitrary manner in which he subdivided colors (in modern
terms, what wavelength was chosen to define each of the seven colors of
the spectrum)—he preserved the musical scale/color spectrum analogy by
invoking the ratio 2/3. As is well known, this ratio played a decisive role
both in the science of harmonics (it is the ratio for the fifth, which, after the
octave, is the most important consonant interval) and in Keplerian astronomy (it occurs in Kepler’s third law according to which the planetary periods of revolution around the sun T and their mean distances d from the sun
are such that T 2/3 cd, c constant). Therefore, a Pythagorean way of thinking seems to be lurking here, since a ratio basic for the understanding of
planetary orbits was invoked by Newton for preserving the analogy
between colors and sounds. Dennis Sepper consequently observes that ‘‘the
circle of colours would thus bear a certain analogy with the circles of planets.’’35 Pesic elaborates on Sepper’s cautious hypothesis, and in explicit
support of Gouk’s interpretation of Newton as an exponent of NeoPythagoreanism (which he approvingly cites), he claims,
Given the great importance of the cube root of the square in Newton’s astronomical work, one can readily believe that he seized on
it here with pleasure, perhaps seeing an opportunity to extend his
musical analogy to the cosmic scale at the same time as he used it
Newton, Opticks, 211–12.
Dennis L. Sepper, Newton’s Optical Writings: A Guided Study (New Brunswick, N.J.:
Rutgers University Press, 1994), 123.
34
35
59
................. 18340$
PAGE 59
12-20-12 12:30:09
Page 18
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)to subsume the major sixth to the overarching octave. His reinterpretation of the data not only ‘‘agrees better with the Observation’’ but also sets forth a rival Keplerian ‘‘Third Law,’’ here for
the harmonies of coloured rings, rather than of planets.36
However, Newton never mentions any connection between the ratio 2/3
(i.e. the cube root of the square) used in relation to the study of colored
rings and Kepler’s third law. Nowhere, for that matter, neither in his manuscripts nor in his printed works, does he relate any laws of optics to planetary motions. Pesic’s interpretation, which would support Gouk’s reading
of Newton as a defender of Neo-Pythagoreanism, cannot be ruled out, and
it still stands as a fascinating interpretative hypothesis. However, it seems
to me to be somewhat far-fetched, at least when applied to the years following the composition of the Principia: for in the winter of 1684–85 Newton
had realized—as we have seen above—that planetary orbits do not obey
Kepler’s laws precisely because of perturbations caused by mutual gravitational interactions.
What I am particularly keen to stress here is the fact that while no
doubt fascinated by the analogy between the musical scale and the color
spectrum, Newton—who stands by this view in texts as widely dispersed as
the manuscripts dated to 1665, the 1672–75 ‘‘Hypothesis,’’ a 1685 letter
to William Briggs, the 1690 preparatory manuscripts for the Opticks and
finally the second English edition of the Opticks from 1717–18—displays
an outlook far removed from Neo-Pythagoreanism.37 His study of the analogies between the musical scale and the color spectrum was motivated by
his interest in the physiology of perception in terms of the vibrations of
a fluid ether contained in the ‘‘optick nerves,’’ a hypothetical theory that
resurfaces in some of the queries at the end of the Opticks.38 Rather than
any mystical correspondences between light and musical harmony, what I
believe Newton was interested in were the mechanistic theories about consonance in terms of air vibrations, and the idea of an animal spirit in the
acoustic nerves as an explanation for the mechanism of hearing. What
Newton attempted to do was to extend the acoustic perception theories
already circulating as viable hypotheses to visual perception.
Pesic, ‘‘Mystery of the Major Sixth,’’ 297.
Newton, Correspondence, 2:417–18.
38
See queries 13 and 14 (from the 1704 first edition of the Opticks) and queries 17 and
23 (from the English 1717–18 edition). Newton, Opticks, 345–48, 353.
36
37
60
................. 18340$
PAGE 60
12-20-12 12:30:10
Page 19
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)Before I turn to examine the second Pythagorean crux in Newtonian
thought, namely the relation between musical harmonies and astronomical
laws, I wish to stress my belief that Newton’s ‘‘voice’’ is far removed from
the numerological rhetoric of men such as Dee and Fludd, and from the
geometrical and musical analogies that guided Kepler’s cosmogonical
thought. Newton’s method seems to me experimental and geared towards
the explanation of optical interference phenomena (the rings) in terms of
interactions between light corpuscles and the optical ether, and the physiology of hearing and vision in terms of the vibrations transmitted through the
nerves. I fail to find in Newton any traces of a language consonant with,
say, Rosicrucian mysticism or Marsilio Ficino’s Neo-Platonism. In his outlook Newton was actually rather averse to Neo-Platonism, which he held
responsible for the Nicean corruption of the Christian faith, and he was
just as averse to the Jewish Kabbalistic tradition, which he tore to bits.39
But let us now move on to the manuscript notes related to the project
for a new edition of the Principia that, according to Gouk’s view, prove
Newton’s adherence to the Neo-Pythagorean myth of the harmony of the
spheres, his Classical Scholia.40 In these scholia, which were probably composed in the years 1693–94, Newton claims that atomism, heliocentrism,
and the gravitational theory were all known to the ancient sages, among
whom Pythagoras is given pride of place. The latter he respectfully includes
in his genealogy of ancient sages sprung from the wisdom of Noah and
Moses. Newton embraced the myth according to which Pythagoras, Leucippus, and Democritus had inherited the foundations of this wisdom from
the Phoenician Moschos. The Pythagorean tradition was thus seen to
preserve certain elements of ancient Hebrew wisdom: heliocentrism and a
cosmology of vacuum and atoms. In the 1690s, after having written the
Principia, Newton started crediting the ancient pagan sages, instructed via
transmission of the esoteric Hebrew tradition, with a knowledge of the laws
governing celestial mechanics, which he claimed to have simply rediscovered. That the myth of the rediscovery of an ancient wisdom was deeply
rooted in Newton’s mind appears evident from ‘‘The Original of MonarchMatt Goldish, Judaism in the Theology of Sir Isaac Newton (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998),
141–61; Michael T. Walton, ‘‘The Geometrical Kabbalahs of John Dee and Johannes
Kepler: The Hebrew Tradition and the Mathematical Study of Nature,’’ in Experiencing
Nature: Proceedings of a Conference in Honour of Allen G. Debus, ed. Paul H. Theerman
and Karen Hunger Parshall (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997), 43–59.
40
See Gouk, ‘‘Harmonic Roots,’’ 120–24; and Music, Science and Natural Magic,
251–57.
39
61
................. 18340$
PAGE 61
12-20-12 12:30:10
Page 20
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)ies’’ (1693–94?), where he states that Numa was a ‘‘Pythagorean Philosopher.’’41 More famously, in the very opening lines of De mundi systemate,
probably written in 1686, Newton claims that the ancients held that the
Earth moves as a planet around the sun. According to Newton, the Copernican theory was taught by ‘‘Philolaus, Aristarchus of Samo, Plato in his
riper years [. . .] the whole sect of the Pythagoreans [. . .] Anaximander
[. . .] and Numa Pompilius.’’ It was only after Eudoxus, Callippus, and
Aristotle that ‘‘the ancient philosophy began to decline, and to give place
to the new prevailing fictions of the Greeks.’’42 In an intended preface to
the Principia written in the late 1710s, Newton attributes to the ‘‘Chaldeans,’’ the ‘‘Ancients,’’ the ‘‘Pythagoreans,’’ and the ‘‘Greeks and Romans’’ a knowledge of universal gravitation.43
In the Classical Scholia one reads that Pythagoras had esoterically
expressed the law of universal gravitation through his talk of Apollo’s lyre.
In order to appreciate Newton’s account of this myth, but especially his
rhetoric, it is worth quoting at length from the Classical Scholia. Newton
writes,
By what proportion gravity decreases by receding from the Planets
the ancients have not sufficiently explained. Yet they appear to
have adumbrated it by the harmony of the celestial spheres, designating the Sun and the remaining six planets, Mercury, Venus,
Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, by means of Apollo with the Lyre of
seven strings, and measuring intervals of the spheres by the interval
of the tones [. . .] But by this symbol they indicated that the Sun
by his own force acts upon the planets in that harmonic ratio of
distances by which the force of tension acts upon strings of different lengths, that is, reciprocally in the duplicate ratio of the distances. For the force by which the same tension acts on the same
string of different lengths is reciprocally as the square of the length
of the string. The same tension upon a string half as long acts four
times as powerfully, for it generates the Octave, and the Octave is
MS Keynes 146, f. 16r, edited in Frank E. Manuel, Isaac Newton, Historian (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963), 212.
42
Isaac Newton, Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and
His System of the World, trans. Andrew Motte and Florian Cajori (1729/1734; repr.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962), 549–50.
43
C.U.L. MS Add. 3968.9, f. 109r-109v; in Isaac Newton, The Mathematical Papers of
Isaac Newton, 8 vols., ed. D. T. Whiteside (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1967–81), 8:459.
41
62
................. 18340$
PAGE 62
12-20-12 12:30:10
Page 21
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)produced by a force four times as great. [. . .] And, in general
terms, if two strings equal in thickness are stretched by weights
appended, these strings will be in unison when the weights are
reciprocally as the square of the lengths of the strings. Now this
argument is subtle, yet became known to the ancients. For Pythagoras, as Macrobius avows, stretched the intestines of sheep or the
sinews of oxen by attaching various weights, and from this learned
the ratio of the celestial harmony. Therefore by means of such
experiments he ascertained that the weights by which all tones on
equal strings [. . .] were reciprocally as the square of the lengths of
the string by which the musical instrument emits the same tones.
But the proportions discovered by these experiments, on the evidence of Macrobius, he applied to the heavens and consequently
by comparing those weights with the weights of the Planets and
the lengths of the strings with the distance of the Planets, he understood by means of the harmony of the heavens that the weights of
the Planets towards the Sun were reciprocally as the square of their
distances from the Sun.44
If we then imagine the planets as ‘‘tied’’ to the sun by the mythical seven
strings of Apollo’s lyre, in order for the strings to vibrate in unison, a tension must be exercised on them that stands in a certain ratio to the length
of the strings. The tension of the strings would then be, in Pythagoras’
mystical language, analogous to gravitation, while the lengths of the strings
would stand for the distances of the planets from the sun.
The strings of Apollo’s lyre are seven, like the celestial bodies orbiting
around the Earth according to the Ptolemaic system. Here we have an
equivalence between the number of celestial bodies and the number of notes
on the musical scale. This equivalence, however, does not hold for the Copernican system, where the number of planets orbiting around the Sun is
six. One immediately realizes that in order to discern a message about the
Copernican system behind the mythical tale of Apollo’s seven-stringed
instrument, one must give it a rather artificial reading, since there is no
literal correspondence between the number of strings and the number of
planets. But there is a more disturbing discrepancy concerning the analogy
between tension and gravitational force. Marin Mersenne had already
shown in 1636 that in order to vibrate in unison two strings with the same
44
Translation in McGuire and Rattansi, ‘‘Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan,’ ’’ 115–17.
63
................. 18340$
PAGE 63
12-20-12 12:30:11
Page 22
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)density and an equal cross section, it is necessary for their tensions to be
proportional, and not inversely proportional, to the square of their length.
According to Mersenne’s law, the frequency f of the sound produced by
plucking a string is proportional to the square root of the tension T and
inversely proportional to the length l of the string, or, to use an algebraic
formalism absent from Mersenne’s work, f k(T)1/2/l (where the constant
k depends upon the physical properties of the string). This law was well
known in the 1690s, since Mersenne had published it in Harmonie Universelle (1636–37). Newton was aware of Mersenne’s work, which he cites
in the Principia.45 However, regardless of the exact formulation of the law
(which in practice had to be slightly adjusted in order to take into consideration the stiffness of the string), he certainly understood that the lowering
effect on pitch caused by an increase in the length of the string has to be
compensated by an increase (and not by a decrease) in tension, in order to
maintain the pitch unaltered. Therefore, no mathematically valid relation
can be very easily discerned between musical harmony and the force of
gravitation, which, of course, decreases with distance. In short, Newton’s
statement, ‘‘And, in general terms, if two strings equal in thickness are
stretched by weights appended, these strings will be in unison when the
weights are reciprocally as the square of the lengths of the strings,’’ on
which the analogy rests, is wrong.
Several interpretations of the analogy between the force of gravity and
the tension on Pythagoras’s monochord might be attempted in order to
render Newton’s statements in the Classical Scholia compatible with
Mersenne’s law. On this issue, the reader might want to consult eighteenthcentury commentators such as Colin Maclaurin, or the more recent work
by Sigalia Dostrovsky.46 The latter claims that Newton’s statement in the
Classical Scholia has to be interpreted so that for ‘‘frequency’’ one understands a magnitude proportional to the planet’s angular velocity.47 Nothing
in Newton’s words seems to support the plausibility of this interpretation.
The most radical point of view is that of Tito Tonietti, who claims that
Marin Mersenne, Harmonie Universelle (Paris: Ballard, 1636–37). Mersenne, Harmonicorum Libri XII (Paris: Baudry, 1648), referred to in Newton, Philosophiae Naturalis
Principia Mathematica (London: Streater, 1687), 372. Mersenne’s law is cited in proposition IX of Harmonicorum, 2:12. See Peter Dear, Mersenne and the Learning of the
Schools (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988), 139–60.
46
Colin Maclaurin, An Account of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophical Discoveries (London: Millar, 1750), 34.
47
Sigalia Dostrovsky, ‘‘Early Vibration Theory: Physics and Music in the Eighteenth Centrury,’’ Archive for History of Exact Sciences 14 (1975): 211.
45
64
................. 18340$
PAGE 64
12-20-12 12:30:11
Page 23
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)Newton was wrong.48 What Newton might want to imply in the above
passage is that if one halves a string, one produces the same note as that
obtained by increasing the tension fourfold; or if one shortens the string to
one third of its length, one produces the same note as that obtained by
increasing the tension by a factor of nine, etc. (‘‘The same tension upon a
string half as long acts four times as powerfully, for it generates the Octave,
and the Octave is produced by a force four times as great.’’) Is this the key
to Newton’s reading of the Pythagorean myth of Apollo’s lyre as an analogy
between the tension of the strings and gravitation?
Be that as it may, I believe that the musical analogy between Apollo’s
lyre and the planetary system should not be taken too literally, and therefore requires no strictly rigorous mathematical interpretation. In my opinion, it is Newton’s intention to attribute only a metaphorical role to this
analogy, and therefore it is misleading to read the Classical Scholia in excessively formalized terms, namely by relating Newton’s statements—which
are couched in a symbolic and mythological language—to Mersenne’s law.
I surmise that, according to Newton, Pythagoras concealed his knowledge
through ciphered language by adopting the above analogy so as to enable
the wise to grasp a coded message conveying a truth about the planetary
system. Indeed, Newton continues the passage just quoted by warning his
readers,
But the Philosophers loved so to mitigate their mystical discourses
that in the presence of the vulgar they foolishly propounded vulgar
matters for the sake of ridicule, and hid the truth beneath discourses of this kind [. . .] Pythagoras beneath parables of this sort
was hiding his own system and the true harmony of the heavens.49
In his Euhemeristic reading of Greek and Roman mythology, in his biblical
hermeneutics of prophecies, and in his approach to alchemical literature
and emblems, Newton was guided by the idea that the ancient texts needed
to be deciphered according to rules known to the interpreters and ultimately decoded as statements concerning plain historical or scientific facts,
rather than to be approached, as in the Renaissance Philonic tradition, as
allegories of a mystical nature.50 For those acquainted with Newton’s readTito M. Tonietti, ‘‘Does Newton’s Musical Model of Gravitation Work? A Mistake
and Its Meaning,’’ Centaurus 42 (2000): 135–49.
49
Translation in McGuire and Rattansi, ‘‘Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan,’ ’’ 117.
50
Manuel, Historian, 120–21; Goldish, Judaism, 52.
48
65
................. 18340$
PAGE 65
12-20-12 12:30:12
Page 24
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)ing of pagan emblems, biblical allegories, and sacred architectural proportions, it will come as no surprise that in the Classical Scholia two ideas are
prominent: that the ancients possessed superior scientific knowledge; and
that they adumbrated factual truths in a symbolical language for which an
interpretative key had to be found by following philological and iconographic rules.
With the above considerations I cannot claim that I have disproved
Gouk’s Pythagorean reading of the Classical Scholia. Historical interpretation seldom allows one to reach such razor-sharp results. My more modest
claim is that, by placing these texts in a somewhat broader context, I have
offered a more plausible reconstruction of Newton’s intended meaning,
or—as some intellectual historians would put it—of the ‘‘illocutionary
force’’ implied in Newton’s pronouncements concerning Pythagoras. I am
very much in favor of conceiving historical interpretation as addressed to
uncovering authorial intentions. That is why I have paid so much attention
to what Quentin Skinner called the ‘‘proper emphasis and tone of an
author’s work’’: something that can be recovered only by paying due attention both to the linguistic conventions accepted by the author and to what
the author was ‘‘doing in saying what he said,’’ since Newton’s actions
vis-à-vis his contemporaries reveal the relationship he wished to establish
between himself as an author and his readers and acolytes.51 Thus, I claim
that the Classical Scholia should be viewed as evidence for Newton’s adherence, at least in the 1690s, to the myth of prisca sapientia. According to his
perspective, the musical harmonies engendered in the cosmos which the
ancients spoke of must be regarded as a code to be deciphered: they are not
to be understood literally. The mistaken application of Mersenne’s law
would appear to confirm the above interpretation. Newton seems to have
interpreted the myth of Apollo’s lyre as a coded message—one of the many
ciphered messages hidden behind Greco-Roman mythology and the allegories of the apocalypse on which he focused in his studies of alchemy and
biblical hermeneutics—not as a truth revealing the harmonies of the cosmos, something he, after the mid-1680s, did not believe in as a cosmologist
and theologian.
Over the course of the sixteenth century, the Neo-Pythagorean myth of
celestial harmonies that had been endorsed by many in the late Renaissance
was gradually abandoned, although it was still accepted in the late 1620s
I refer to Quentin Skinner’s employment of the theory of illocutionary acts due to J. L.
Austin in ‘‘Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas (1969),’’ in Visions of
Politics, vol. 1, Regarding Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 85.
51
66
................. 18340$
PAGE 66
12-20-12 12:30:12
Page 25
Voir dans le PDF(s’ouvre dans une nouvelle fenêtre)by a giant such as Kepler. Newton has been associated with this ‘‘lateRenaissance’’ wing by Gouk and Pesic. According to their view, he upheld
the idea of the harmony between music and light phenomena in the
‘‘Hypothesis,’’ and between music and gravitational phenomena in the
Classical Scholia. Several aspects of Gouk’s and Pesic’s interpretation are
perfectly acceptable. As they show, Newton was fascinated by the myth of
an ancient lore expressing the ‘‘analogy of nature’’ in musical terms. However, viewing Newton as a Neo-Pythagorean natural philosopher, or even a
‘‘Pythagorean magus,’’ as Gouk would have it, is problematic, since this
approach fails to take account of the context in which Newton engaged
with these musical metaphors, a context which reveals a mentality in many
ways removed from Neo-Pythagoreanism.
University of Bergamo.
67
................. 18340$
PAGE 67
12-20-12 12:30:12