Mostrar texto completo6 páginas
Página 1
Ver en el PDF(se abre en una ventana nueva)Jams ice mumanut,
Met Whom What?
Fritz Senn
2522 sk
Zürich James Joyce Foundation
ss a +
\ ANT
his note takes off from a remark that has been made in criticism
several times—that Bloom in his explication of “metempsychosis” somehow mistakenly swerves into a related notion, metamorphosis, when he illustrates the term in his second didactic attempt:
“They used to believe you could be changed into an animal or a tree,
for instance” (U4.375-76).* As usual, Bloom is not really wrong (if the
term has any meaning), but quite on target.
Bloom’ serial explication of “metempsychosis,” after only a brief
moment of getting his thoughts together, is surprisingly accurate:
“That means the transmigration of souls” (U4.341). This could have
been taken straight out of a reference book that Gerty MacDowell
once consulted about “halcyon days,” “Walker's pronouncing dictionary” (U13.342-43), which reads: “The transmigration of the soul
into the bodies of other animals, as taught by Pythagoras, and still
believed in some parts of the East.” So the idea of transformation
into animals or plants traditionally can be evoked by the term. The
theosophists had later on tended to emphasize the idea as derived
from Hinduism, in the more exclusive sense of purely human avatars. But it is on record that human souls can pass into the lower
spheres.
Rebuffed by Molly, in his resilient exemplifications Bloom indeed
drifts away from the narrower concept towards a more general
notion of transformation in the example already quoted, that “you
could be changed into an animal or a tree, for instance. What they
called nymphs, for example” (U4.376-77). As said before, such examples had been given in profusion by Ovid in his Metamorphoses, in
which the first extended story relates to Daphnes change into the
laurel. Ovid, however, also had anticipated Bloom in reverse direction-towards metempsychosis. From multiple mythological
changes (gods into humans, humans into animals or plants,? also
into heavenly bodies), the poem includes the doctrines of
Pythagoras, whose description of the transmigration of souls takes
up a great part of the last book, which also serves as a philosophical
basis for the whole anthology of mythological changes. Pythagoras
Página 2
Ver en el PDF(se abre en una ventana nueva)Met Whom What?
Fritz Senn
Zurich
James Joyce Foundation
note takes off from a remark that has been made
in criticism
Bloom in his explication
of "metempsycho
This several times-that
swerves into a related notion, metamor
sis" somehow mistakenly
when he illustrates the term in his second didactic
attempt:
to believe you could be
used
an animal or a tree,
'They
changed into
for instance" (U4.375-76).1 As usual, Bloomis not really wrong
(if the
term has any meaning),
but quite on target.
phosis,
Bloom's serial explication
of "metempsychosis,"
after only a brief
moment
of getting his thoughts
accurate:
together, is surprisingly
"That means
the transmigration
of souls" (114.341). This could have
been taken straight out of a reference book that Gerty MacDowell
once
consulted
about
dic
"halcyon days," "Walker's pronouncing
which
"The
of
reads:
the
soul
tionary" (U13.342-43),
transmigration
into the bodies of other animals, as taught by Pythagoras,
and still
in some parts of the East."2 So the idea of transformation
believed
can be evoked by the term. The
into animals or plants traditionally
on
had
to
the idea as derived
later
tended
theosophists
emphasize
in the more exclusive sense of purely human ava
from Hinduism,
tars, But it is on record that human
souls can pass into the lower
spheres.
Rebuffed byMolly in his resilient exemplifications Bloom indeed
towards a more
concept
away from the narrower
general
that "you
in the example already quoted,
notion of transformation
could be changed
into an animal or a tree, for instance, What they
called nymphs,
for example"
(LT4.376-77). As said before, such ex
in
been
in
had
profusion by Ovid in his Metamorphoses,
given
amples
to
the
into
relates
which
the first extended
change
story
Daphne's
laurel Ovid, however,
also had anticipated Bloom in reverse direc
From multiple
tion -towards
mythological
metempsychosis.
into animals or plants,3 also
humans
into
humans,
changes
(gods
of
the doctrines
includes
the poem
into heavenly
bodies),
takes
souls
of
of
the
whose
transmigration
description
Pythagoras,
serves as a philosophical
up a great part of the last book, which also
of mythological
basis for the whole
changes. Pythagoras
anthology
drifts
Página 3
Ver en el PDF(se abre en una ventana nueva)nor is the term
from Samos"4),
is "a man
most
reference
mention
works
used;
"metempsychosis"
Pythagoras
as the inventor of the term. But his views are paraphrased
at
length.
of
them
within nature. The
They describe all kinds of changes, many
reads like this:
message
metempsychotic
is not
named
(he
morte
carent
animae
semperque
priore
relicta
sede novis domibus vivunt habitantque receptae (Met.15.158-59)
(our souls are deathless, and ever, when they have left their former
seat, do they live in new abodes and dwell in the bodies that have
received them-M^.377)
Ulysses run like this: "For souls are free of
preceding
/Their former
death. Howbeit,
are
they leaving evermore
dwellings
received and live again in new" (Arthur Golding,
"Nor
dies
1567);
the Spirit, but new Life repeats / In other Forms, and only
changes
Seats" (John Dryden,
1693); "Souls are not subject to death; and
left their former abode, they ever inhabit new
having
dwellings,
and, there received, live on" (Henry T. Riley 1889).5 Poetic forms too
undergo changes in different minds;
thoughts find new habitations,
Translations
is that the semantic soul
and a justification underlying
all translation
is somehow preserved
in ever new verbal embodiments.
Bloom is not quoting Ovid's poem, nor is Joyce, but some phras
we go on
ings almost might be taken over: "that
living" (114.362;
some
"or
other
"vivunt");
planet" (U4.364; "novis domibus"). Dryden's
to a recollection
"and only changes
seats" could even be aligned
Barn when he and
Bloom has of the times at Dolphin's
first
Molly
we
also
learn
"Musical
much
chairs.
We
later,
played charades, and,
two the last-Round
Such pairings
and round slow" (till.726-27).
are not
but
allusive,
intentionally
simply inevitable, given the nature
of the subject.
The
nings,
soul in its wanderings
as Bloom well knows,
its previous
does not remember
in
we
and so he expands:
have
"They say
it. Some
their past lives" (U4.364-65).
say they remember
oblivion
(the next epi
Remembering,
memory-and
conversely
on that theme)-are
basic
sode, "Lotus Eaters," will ring changes
and recalls and elaborates on
principles.
Ulysses celebrates memory
on their memories.
manifold
Its readers depend
With
distortions.
out knowing
on record
it, Bloom evokes a ghost. The first person
with a memory
of a past life is again Pythagoras
himself. He had
the city against the
been, as he claimed, a Trojan hero defending
forgotten
Greeks:
Página 4
Ver en el PDF(se abre en una ventana nueva)ipse ego (nam memini) Troiani tempore belli
Panthoides Euphorbus eram (Met. 15:160-61)
[for I remember it], in the days of the Trojan war was
(I myself
the son of
Euphorbus,
Panthous~Riley522)
On
one occasion he even
recognized
a literary reincarnation
of
his own shield.
So Joyce makes
hero
before
Odysseus,
Troy un
call
in
who
his
former
existence
had
been a
up Pythagoras,
wittingly
minor Trojan warrior, Euphorbus,
on the opposite
side of the camp.
was killed
sources
Classical
Euphorbus
(II. 17.59,.81).
by Menelaos
Laertius gave an even more detailed
like Diogenes
account of the
of that particular
soul;
traiTsmigrations
Bloom,
He had once been Aethalides and was accounted to be Hermes' son,
and Hermes told him he might choose any gift he liked except immor
tality; so he asked to retain through life and through death amemory
of his experiences. Hence in life he could recall everything, and when
he died he still kept the same memories. Afterwards in the course of
time his soul entered Euphorbus and he was wounded by Men
then he told of the wanderings of his soul,6 how itmigrated
elaus.,.
hither and thither, into how many plants and animals it had come,
in Hades-When
and all that it underwent
Euphorbus died, his
soul passed into Hermotimus..
.he identified the shield?When
Hermotimus
died, he became Pyrrhus, a fisherman of Delos?But
when Pyrrhus died, he became Pythagoras, and still remembered all
the facts mentioned.7
was
a most
in
all-round person,
versed
versatile,
Pythagoras
and
numbers
above
all.
Bloom's
music,
spec
geometry
mysteries,
on "Numbers
it is. All music when
ulation
you come to think" is
lore (1/11.830). Ovid tells us that he was'a
ultimately
Pythagorean
like Joyce, and
exile
("exul sponte eraf-Met.15.61-62),
voluntary
of
and
carefulness
attributes
him
the
curiosity: "animo et vigili
gives
and
examined
all
curd'
("he
things with his mind,
perspexerat omnia
a
is
charac
cura"
with watchful
15.65). "Vigilis
certainly
study"-Met
was interested and
teristic of Bloom and of Odysseus.
Pythagoras
and the
in such things as the origin of the universe
knowledgeable
or
come
snow
causes of
the
from
does
lightning; what
things (where
course
the stars); all
the
of
laws
direct
makes
the earth quake; what
con
are
Bloomian
in
interest
the
of this, and in particular
causes,
on
his
to
used
is
cerns as well The difference
that Pythagoras
pass
set
"He
crowd:
a
to
to make it public
silently wondering
knowledge,
them openly /Abroad for other folk to learn" (Golding379). Bloom
as well, but is rarely given the chance;
to such instruction
aspires
Some projec
even Molly
is no longer listening to his clarification.
Página 5
Ver en el PDF(se abre en una ventana nueva)tions in "Circe" see him as public adviser, but when he tries to hold
"Mister Knowall. Teach your
forth in "Cyclops," he is easily mocked:
to
milk
ducks"
how
(LT12.838).
grandmother
as speaking
Bloom is remembered
up for "Humane methods.
Because
the poor animals suffer" (LZ12.843). Pythagoras
appears in
he enjoins re
above all as a preaching
vegetarian;
Metamorphoses
that one is not to kill and eat animals, because
they contain
peatedly
no vegetarian,
a
souls. Bloom is pointedly
though he appreciates
from meat. One of his thoughts
of abstaining
few advantages
ap
"If you do [eat beefsteak]
the
injunctions:
proximates
Pythagorean
cow
will pursue you through all eternity"
eyes of that
(U8.535-36).
are elucidators
At any rate, both Bloom in Ulysses and Pythagoras
Later on, Molly will make fun of his
of metempsychosis.
proclivity
the scene: "hed say its
she remembers
to teach and instruct when
from the Greek leave us as wise as we were before" (U18.241-42).
a term that is
Bloom is right, however, when he patiently
explains
"It's Greek:
connected
from the
originally with wise Pythagoras:
Greek"
(LT4.341).
a final note on Molly's need for an explanation
of "Met
Perhaps
in the first place ("final" in the sense of terminating
him..."
this
Bloom's
note, that is, not the debate). She thwarts with contempt
first try, and as he keeps groping for better instruction,
she seems to
lose interest altogether and attends entirely to her tea cup until she
here is that she
notices the smell from the kitchen. The contention
does not even primarily want to know. Some moments
the
before,
conversation-an
intricate connubial game (where both know what
the other may have inmind and yet agree to stay clear of a touchy
visit this afternoon.
close to the impending
Casu
subject)-comes
then
ally diverting him, Molly asks about the time of the funeral,
It is a bait to divert
points towards the book and offers the word.
Bloom's attention and is entirely successful. Molly knows how her
loves to explain, to hold forth, to instruct, so she throws
husband
him a bone, and he gnaws at it, along with us readers (who of course
at this early stage do not know either of the characters).
It is a
of
wise
it
herself.
And
stands
stratagem worthy
Penelope
Joyce in
a
stead
term
with
ramifications.
good
by introducing
multiple
NOTES
1The most recent view is from
Patrick McCarthy's "Reading inUlysses," in
JoyceanOccasions: Essays from theMilwaukee JamesJoyceConference, ed. Janet E.
et al. (Newark: Univ. of Delaware Press, 1991), p. 23.
Dunleavy,
2
John Walker, Walker's Pronouncing Dictionary (London: Longman and
Company 1860).
Página 6
Ver en el PDF(se abre en una ventana nueva)Compare the Protean variant: "God becomes man becomes fish be
comes barnacle goose becomes featherbed mountain"
(113.477-79).
4
Ovid, Metamorphoses, ed. Frank Justus Miller (Cambridge: Harvard
Univ. Press, 1976). Further references will be cited
in the text
parenthetically
as Met.
5
Ovid, SelectedWorks, trans. Arthur Golding (London: J.M. Dent, 1939),
p. 380; John Dryden, The Poems of JohnDryden, ed. John Sargeaunt (London:
Oxford Univ. Press, 1935), p. 498; Ovid, TheMetamorphoses of Ovid, trans.
T. Riley (London: George Bell and Sons, 1889),
Henry
p. 522.
6
of
"xrjq ipvxr]<;mQLnoXr\oiy,"
the soul."
which
seems
to be
the origin
of
"transmigration
7
Diogenes Laertius, "Pythagoras" VIII.4-6, in Lives of Eminent Philoso
phers, Book Four. Loeb Classical Library (Cambridge and London: Harvard
Univ. Press, 1925), pp. 323-25.
Djuna
Barnes Remembers
James Joyce
Phillip Herring
University
of Wisconsin,
Madison
Barnes's famous interview with James Joyce came out in
of Ulysses in 1922;
after the publication
Djuna Vanity Fair a few months
of him in "Vagaries Malicieux,"
then she continued her impressions
an unmalicious,
if definitely
rambling article describing her first trip
to Paris.1 Richard Ellmann used some of her details in his biography
James Joyce.
known as the brilliant New
When
they met, Barnes was mostly
in the fall of 1921 to observe
York journalist sent by McCall's Magazine
friends and
the Left Bank scene. There were any number of mutual
Barnes
had met Helen
Fleischman,
Peggy Gug
in 1917. Joyce and
cousin
and
Joyce's wife-to-be,
Giorgio
genheim's
Barnes were
friends of Robert McAlmon
and, of course, Sylvia
at her bookstore.
to
meet
them
for
who
Beach,
arranged
perhaps
across from
aux
Deux
at
the
Caf
took
Their meetings
Magots,
place
a
from
Barnes's
throw
stone's
des
church
St.
the
of
Germain
Prfes,
connections:
in Paris, she had
flat. Barnes
said that, during her four months
talked with him often.
With
the keen eye of a portrait painter, Barnes saw Joyce emerge
from the fog sporting goatee, blue gray coat, and heirloom waist
she says that she had read Dubliners during
coat,2 In the interview,
and
Exiles to theatrical committees,
World War I, had recommended
a
its
as
after
Man
Artist
had perused A Portrait of the
shortly
Young
she
read
when
in
but she only spotted the singer
Joyce
publication,