Mostra testo completo1 pagine
Pagina 1
Vedi nel PDF(si apre in una nuova finestra)THISWEEK
New Scientist 14 July 1990
Government rethinks stand over altered organisms
HE BRITISH government has bowed to
pressure over its “green” bill and will
now consider giving the public access to
information on proposed releases of genetically modified organisms into the environment. This U-turn came as the Environment
Protection Bill completed its committee
stages in the House of Lords last week.
Legislation over genetically modified organisms has proved to be one of the most
contentious areas of the bill. An anomaly in
the legislation means that the treatment of
products of genetic engineering is misaligned
with proposals for handling other potential
threats to the environment, such as toxic
waste and other pollutants. While the legislation requires information on these to be
made public, this does not apply to genetically altered organisms.
Environmentalists argue that this omission is a serious flaw in the bill, and they
have been campaigning for the legislation to
state exactly the information to be made
public. This, the environmentalists argue,
would increase public confidence in the
safety of releases of genetically modified
organisms outside. It is too important, they
say, to be left to the regulations that flesh out
the bill after it gains royal assent.
The Lords who argued for an amendment
on this issue insisted that the public has a
Dutch go greener
T HE DUTCH government last week allocated an additional billion Dutch guilders (about £310 million) a year to a new
“improved” version of the country's ambitious 20-year National Environment Plan
(NEP), first prepared in 1988. The revised
there is a great danger that the whole project
of genetic engineering on a commercial scale
may be frustrated by public opposition motivated by fear of the unknown. If one has
such a reaction from the public, the whoie
industry will come to a stop,” said Lord
Nathan.
The government has also agreed to consider an amendment which would recognise
the formation of an advisory committee to
monitor any proposed releases—the Advisory Committee on Releases to the
Environment (ACRE). This, too, had been
left to the regulations, and environmentalists
feared that the environment minister might
choose not to make public the advice of the
committee, or perhaps might change its
status, without having to seek parliamentary
“We wish to see a committee which will
have an existence that is secure; which will
have a right to be consulted on each
case... . and minimum safeguards to secure
public disclosure of information,” said Lord
Clinton-Davies in moving an amendment to
the bill last week. ‘We know that as a matter
of practice the government have been somewhat cavalier about consultation. Why
should we take them on trust in the future?”
dem-
LL.
Greeks
have
i
but an accelerated implementation of the
credit for being the first
}-.
measures so that the long-term objectives
modern scientists. Plato
4
the Environment Ministry
in The Hague.
been great theorists, but
founding
ocracy and theatre, the
ancient
are achieved earlier,” said Eduard Groen of and the rest may have
whose costs will rise by 16 per cent and 50
per cent respectively. Householders’ costs
-
A teen
they have failed to impress as experimenters.
Now, argues Andrew
Dimarogonas
+
à
È ;
©
Originally planned to exact high penalties for their practical work. | ®
1994. Prime Minister Ruud Lubbers had
Greeks do deserve credit
|
from motorists, raising their uaa By up to 50
He concludes a pers
E
4.
per cent to reduce the number
of cars
on the
soon to be published
Hin”
_gF -
The revised plan focuses on energy
7 = 7 conservation, and earmarks an additional
650 million guilders a year for such measures
as better insulation of residential and industrial buildings, improved energy efficiency of
appliances and the gradual switch to renewable resources of energy such as wind, solar
and biomass.
The plan aims to cut carbon dioxide emissions by more than 40 per cent by 2000 as part
of the government’s strategy to reduce emissions of the gas—the main pollutant accelerating global warming.
O
Vibration that the Greeks
were scientists.
The picture
above
shows
AA
2
LÉ
$4
i 3
> 3
2 Y
T
0) 0 0 road by more than 2 million. Instead, motor- the Journal of Sound and
#
î i
the | §
in
a
dì f 5
|©
PI
è
= Y
ington
Z S ists get off lightly under the NEP-Plus.
°
3
will remain steady at 30 guilders a monthin
\) A
= ay pete:
We:
|
of Wash-
University,
-
ï À
3
+x
in Britain. They will also give the joint
committee more independence.
D
{fe
change of strategy from the original NEP, popularly been denied | 7
A
ogy. These new measures will strengthen the
role of the joint nature conservation committee, which will coordinate the council’s activities once it has been split up as planned into
three separate agencies, one for each country
New angle on Pythagorian origins of science
mathematics,
The extra burden of financing the NEP-
Conservancy Council—the government's advisory body on conservation—in line with
proposals advocated by the House of Lords
Select Committee on Science and Technol-
Supporting
the
amendment,
Lord
Addington said: ‘*When it comes to these
Dutch describe it as Europe’s most com-
Plus falls mainly on industry and government
House of Lords. It will then return to the
House of Commons for final scrutiny before
becoming law this autumn.
Last week, the government tabled a series
of changes to plans for structuring the Nature
approval.
ESPITE
“The new plan does not represent a
cannot be public enough. Too many decisions tend to be taken behind closed doors.
There is always a danger of people looking
for what they want to see from scientific
advice, rather than seeing what is actually
there."
Julie Hill from the Green Alliance is a
member of the ACRE, which held its first
meeting last week. The committee agreed to
examine the issue of public access to
information on genetically modified organisms as a priority. “The government had
rejected the provisions we wanted in the
bill as unnecessary,” says Hill. “Now they
have recognised our arguments and, we
hope, will provide the guarantees we want
over public access to information.”
Further government amendments to the
bill could emerge later this month when the
legislation reaches its report stage in the
right to know what is going on, and that it
would also be in the best interests of the
biotechnology industry. “If there is not the
information and not the public confidence,
plan, the NEP-Plus, will absorb up to 16
billion Dutch guilders annually by 1994. The
prehensive environmental initiative.
important issues, the government cannot
have too much advice, and the debate
Susan Watts and Roger Milne
23
E
La
.
.
“I
| }
>
(Fr
=
A
|
Pythagoras (right) tests the pitch of blacksmiths’ hammers
Pythagoras
hammer their anvils and decides to investiweighing blacksmiths’ hammers as part of an
experiment to investigate the nature of musigate. His first guess, that the pitch depends
cal notes. The image comes from a Sth-
So he begins to experiment. Having built the
century text, written a thousand years after
Pythagoras’s death, attributed to the Roman
scholar Boethius. It is evidence, says
Dimarogonas, that Pythagoras was the first
modern scientist.
Boethius tells a story about Pythagoras
passing a blacksmiths. He notices the diffirst laboratory instrument, a monochord to
calibrate pitch, he concludes that the note
depends on the intrinsic properties of an
instrument. (The left-hand part of the picture shows Boethius with a monochord.)
Dimarogonas says: “Pythagoras, with his
observations in the metal workers’ shop,
introduced the experimental method.”
ferent notes being produced as blacksmiths
on the strength of the blacksmith, is wrong.