Mostra testo completo1 pagine
Pagina 1
Vedi nel PDF(si apre in una nuova finestra)CORRESPONDENCE
Jury 22, 1961
totals, the main purpose of this letter is to point out that
the authors have seriously misquoted Field.
, On p. 1348 they state: “ A comparison can be made
in both sexes of subjects with parasite counts above and
below 1,000/wl., since this is the level above which
mortality from P. falciparum malaria is known to occur
(Field, 1949).” Using this very low level of parasite
density as a dividing line, the authors then claim that
subjects with normal enzyme levels have higher parasite
counts than subjects with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, and that the difference is statistically
significant in males but not quite so in females. They
regard this as evidence that glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenase deficiency protects against P. falciparum
malaria.
Ss
TAN.
ES
52 Co veyer
Field was trying to assess the prognostic value of
pre-treatment parasite counts in Asian patients admitted
to hospital with an acute attack of uncomplicated
falciparum malaria.
He excluded most cases with
parasitaemia less than 1,000 per c.mm. (ul.) blood from
his data as they were seldom suitable for the evaluation
of the drugs under test; and he found that case
mortality rates only rose significantly when the
peripheral blood before treatment showed at least 100,000
parasites per c.mm. (below 100,000, 11 deaths in 2,139
patients; above 100,000, 39 deaths in 177 patients).
The subject matter of these two investigations differs
so radically that comparison would at best tend to be
misleading. But, as Drs. Allison and Clyde have used
this comparison in support of their opinion, and as the
highest counts in their subjects are recorded only as
10,000
+ /pl., one is left uncertain whether the suggested
differences have in fact any significance.—I am, etc.,
.
BarrisH
MEDICAL JOURNAL
of the sub-continent.
The city of Calcutta with all its
ancient glories contains, in circumstances not quite
under its control, a population which is greatly above
its capacity for normal health and sanitary administration.
Living conditions for the average citizen are
appalling.
The state of the water supply and sewerage
system is desperate, to say the least.
Economic conditions are overburdened with a number of social
problems, and it is a wonder that epidemics are not as
rampant
these
conditions.
days
This
is
as
they
thanks
might
be
under
such
to
awareness
and
the
appreciation of most of the resident population, who,
in spite of great hardship, try to co-operate with the
Sanitary authorities.
With this congestion, lack of sanitation and potable
water supply is linked the elimination of tuberculosis,
cholera, and other such infectious diseases. The W.H.O.
is planning to overhaul the water supply of the metropolis, but for better planning international co-operation
and appreciation of the problems, together with
economic
salvation, are necessary
stigma permanently.—I am, etc.,
The London Chest Hospital,
to
weed
out
this
SANJOY Roy CHOWDHURY.
Arlesey.
Contact Lenses
Sir,—Contact lenses are possibly the desire of every
young female who has to wear spectacles. Their easy
availability (and especially so with hire-purchase assistance) will no doubt result in an increased number of the
population wearing this optical aid.
In my opinion it is indeed unfortunate that, especially
T. Witson.
in the case of the corneal lens, the effects of wearing this
lens—that is, degrees of anaesthesia and abrasion of the
1 Field, J. W., Trans. roy. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg., 1949, 43, 33.
cornea—are not under the supervision of medical practitioners qualified to do this.
I have nothing against a
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.
REFERENCE
well-fitted
Pythagoras and the Beans
Sir,—There was an interesting report by Drs. H. S.
Brodribb and A. R. H. Worssam (May 13, p. 1367) of
a case of favism due to eating broad beans which
occurred at Hastings.
As is well known, the philosopher Pythagoras forbade
his disciples to eat beans. When asked the reason for
this prohibition he replied that it was because his father
(or was it his grandfather ?) had been reincarnated in
a bean plant. This was considered a good joke at
Croton, in Italy, in the sixth century B.c. However, if
Pythagoras, or any of his relatives, had suffered from
favism, it is possible that the rule may have had a
rational basis.—I am, etc.,
A. J. CoL8Y TINGEY.
George,
Province,
Ca
outh Africa.
Cholera
Sir, —Your leading article on cholera (June 10, p.
1664) admirably sums up the problems of bringing
control to this deadly disease endemic in the Eastern
part of the Indian sub-continent. One hopes that the
conclusions drawn in the last lines will provoke constructive thought.
As one of those who come from that unfortunate part
of the country, I may perhaps delve a little into your
last words—i.e., ‘‘co-operation of the population.”
Owing to political and natural calamities, this part of
the country remains the most populous area of the whole
corneal
lens
so
long
as
a
follow-up
has
determined a safe wearing-time. It would be an unhappy
state of affairs if the patient obtained a good tolerance
but with the result that corneal sensation was depressed,
and especially so if the abrasion effect upon the cornea
was not under the control of an ophthalmologist.
We
must suffer a little for our vanity, but medical advice
must be at hand to say how much.
The other point I wish to raise is that the general
practitioner is possibly unaware that in certain cases the
patient is eligible for contact lenses under the National
Health Service at minimal cost.
It would seem therefore sensible that all patients
wishing to have contact lenses should receive advice
from a
medical
general medical practitioner, an ophthalmic
practitioner
under
the
supplementary
ophthalmic scheme, or an ophthalmic surgeon to
decide the best possible treatment available.—I am, etc.,
London W.1.
C. M. RUBEN.
Nitrous Oxide in Dentistry
Sır,—Dr. Donald Blatchley (June 24, p. 1831) is,
I think, quite justified in taking me to task for implying
that the cyanosis seen in screaming children is entirely
due to oxygen lack; but I think that he is equally at
fault in citing local venous engorgement as the only
factor responsible. Contraction of the platysma would
hardly account for the fact that the cyanosis is often
clearly visible in the feet as well as the face, and is
doubtless of mixed origin.