Volledige tekst tonen8 pagina's
Pagina 1
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)PYTHAGORAS BELIEVED THAT ‘THE GODS’ USED
THE SMALL WHOLE NUMBERS TO DESIGN THE
s you read this article you may want
The fortifications and organization in Samos
to pause and work on some of the
were extraordinary and included a military
mathematics.
harbour, walls around, and over, the adjoining
Pythagoras
hills and a tunnel right through a hill to bring
Pythagoras is early amongst the Greek
fresh water to the town from a distant reservoir.
The harbour and the tunnel still exist.
philosophers. So early that nowadays there is
See, http://goo.gl/ZVMwLM
debate about whether he actually existed. His
dates are 2569? — 24757 BCE. This places
i
|
Myth and fact in terms of Pythagoras early life
him as one of the first of the Greek philosopher
shca ee, dered lal
mathematicians. The table below lists a selection
of Greek Mathematicians with their dates.
It is worth noticing that Pythagoras lived three
hundred years before Euclid, a contemporary of
Aristarchus, the first person to consider that the
sun, not the earth, might be at the centre of the
universe.
.
>
.
gypt
Wi
hi
mc
e pensio” next mere
over to Babylon before re-appearing in Saiz
about 12 years tater. Pyineiers Only Si
eet Eee a 2 en oO pe
a
ee
ai
yt EE
the political shenanigans. Pythagoras retired
:
;
The table indicates the time over which Greek
to a cave, preferring to work on philosophy
and geometry before moving out to Croton,
mathematics developed and flourished. Some
in southern Italy, where he founded the
800 years after Pythagoras there was a rich vein
Pythagoreans and remained for the rest of his life.
of mathematical ideas. In 250 AD Diophantus set
about collecting and publishing a set of whole
number problems. These problems were then
worked on and shared amongst the Renaissance
mathematicians leading to further work and
He,
So, to return to the title: ‘the Pythagoreans
believed that ‘the gods’ had used the small whole
numbers to design the universe’.
Patterns in small numbers
Imagine you are with a group of teachers at
conference
Pythagoras
lite
about 569 — about 475 BCE
1+2=3
Euclid of Alexandria
about 325 BCE - about 265 BCE
... and after a pause write
4+5+6=7
+8
underneath.
Aristarchus of Samos
In your head construct the next line.
about 310 BCE - about 230 BCE
You might now have
Archimedes of Syracuse
1+2=3
287 BCE - 212 BCE
4+5+6=7+8
Diophantus of Alexandria
9 +10
+ 11 + 12 = 13 + 14 + 15
about 200 AD - about 284 AD
‘What do you notice?’ Have you any conjectures
at this stage?
Pythagoras was born in the Isle of Samos.
Before reading on it is worth spending time to
Samos, one of many independent rival Greek
consider your own ‘noticings’.
city states was ruled, at the time, by the tyrant
Polycrates. Polycrates had the largest fleet in
the whole Mediterranean, agreements with the
Pharaoh in Egypt about mutual support in the
event of an attack by Athens and so on.
At Conference 2013, there was time for
delegates to work both in groups and individually.
When it came to ‘sharing’, ... some of the
following were aired:
November 2013 www.atm.org.uk
eolie
n
Pagina 2
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)The third row adds to 42. 42 is the answer to
Staying with small numbers, start with
everything.
»
32 + 42 = 52
Aan initial conjecture was that, because of the
... but write underneath,
42, this might be the last line that works.
This conjecture was quickly abandoned!
«
Many participants noticed a square number
33 + 43 + 53 = 63
... and then ask yourself what could be next?
at the start of each line.
In preparing for the session | had looked at this
+
One person noticed that the line starting with
three squared has three times four before the
equals sign and conjectured that the next line
pair of equations asking myself if there were
other triples of cubes? ... and then moving to
conjecturing about fourth powers.
would have four times five before the equal
| had used some of this number pattern work in a
sign.
morning with the Birmingham branch of ATM.
+
The third line had three numbers after three
At the end of that session Tom Francome ‘shared’
squared before the equal sign, and so on.
that he had noticed a connection between the
| asked participants to write down the line that
odd numbers and the cubes.
included the number 40 somewhere within the
run, as a way of steering them to work with a
Ee
slightly more general special case, and as an
3+5=2
antidote to those who wanted to immediately
7+9+11=3
introduce ‘n’ into their talk.
We are talking about the gods. The gods live in
There was not time to work on this at conference.
a higher dimension, perhaps. So, starting with
| allowed it to briefly appear and thanked Tom.
1 + 2 = 3 but trying to move it up a couple of
This is another pattern, | now see, like the first
dimensions | wrote 1° + 2°. | notice that this adds
one that is really accessible via Cuisenaire rods,
Hout 3°, but 37.
at least that is how | gained an insight.
So, what about
Prime Numbers
43 + 23 = 32
The Pythagoreans worked on Prime numbers.
| want to look briefly at prime numbers from a
... followed by
geometric point of view. Start by imagining a
43 + 23 + 33 = 62
collection of cubes. The Pythagoreans were
... and the next line? Is it?
cubes could only be arranged in a line, whilst
interested in the fact that some collections of
15 + 2° + 3° + 48= 10?
©
that you have made from these three
ile. Ordered special cases then watch the
Fu
film at atm.org.uk/mt237
Watching the film suggests that the formula
for the sum of the cubes is accessible to many
people well before it appears in the current
curriculum at early A-level. In fact both of the
primary classes | worked with in Cumbria, before
the conference, seemed really at home with the
idea of slicing their Cuisenaire cubes up, and
filling up a growing square in an organized way.
others like 6 cubes, or 15 cubes could be
arranged into rectangular arrays.
Not many of the small numbers can be
arranged in arrays, four is the first, so we need
a systematic way of finding out which can, and
which cannot, be so arranged.
Use the grid shown in Figure 1. Start by ringing
2, and then cross out all the numbers that can
be arranged in groups of two, 4, 6, 8 ... Next ring
3, and cross out all the multiples of 3. Now on
to 5, ring 5 and cross out all the multiples of 5;
10, 15, 20..., even the ones that are already
crossed out, watching yourself and noticing
where the numbers lie. And next for 7, where do
lt would be wonderful to receive feedback on any
the multiples of 7 lie? Watch yourself crossing
work, by learners, inspired by this type of work.
out 14, 21, 28...
Mathematics Teaching 237 Journal of the Association of Teachers of Mathematics
Pagina 3
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)The spiral in an interactive spreadsheet, can be
3
4
“ex
5
6
SE Oe
7
UE
found on-Ine at www.atm.org.uk/mt237.
Circles
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31
In addition to lines and areas the Pythagoreans
32_|
33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37
were also interested in circles.
38
39
40
“als
41
42
43
ls | #7 | 0 | a
Inside a circle it is possible to draw a number of
so | si | 52 | 53 | sa | 55
s6
|
57
|
58
62
|
68
|
|
59
63
|
69
|
8
64
|
65
|
66
|
67
70
|
71
|
72
|
73
regular polygons as in Figure 3.
61
82
81
87
84
83
| 88 | 89
93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97
98
99
\
|
\
/
LA
\
/
|
100 | 101 | 102 | 103
N
|
i
|
.
f
|
|
85
| so | 91
92
A
==
74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79
Figure 1
Do you need to work with multiples of 11?
=
Using this layout the prime numbers, larger than
Y
3, appear in the two columns either side of the
six times table.
The Pythagoreans were interested in twin
primes, 17 and 19, 29 and 31 etc. Move to one of
Figure 3
the spirals in Figure 2. Use the results from your
first sheet to circle all the primes on one spiral
sheet. A startling result is that on both sheets
Of the regular polygons, squares are the most
readily available so | suggest starting with a
the bottom left to top right diagonal consists of
square.
primes.
»
Why?
»
Find a square of paper.
... Mark the centre of your square
(by folding perhaps).
185
184
183
182
181
180
179
178
177
176
175
174
186/141
140
139
138
137
136
135
134
133
132
131/172
173
187 | 142|105
104
103
102
101
100
99
98
97 | 130/171
188
77
76
75
74
73
72
71 | 96
189 | 144 | 107|
78 | 57
56
55
54
53 | 70 | 95 | 128 | 169
190 | 145 | 108
3
45
44
43 | 52 | 69 | 94 | 127 | 168
191 | 146 | 109 | 80 | 59 | 46 | 41
42 | 51 | 68 | 93 | 126 | 167
192 | 147 | 110]
81 | 60 | 47
48
49
50 | 67 | 92 | 125 | 166
193|148|111|
82 | 61
62
63
64
65
66
91 | 124 | 165
reason with a cut out hexagon, or
watch the film at atm.org.uk/mt237
*
|143|106|
Fold each vertex, in turn, to the centre forming
a new quadrilateral.
*
Is this new quadrilateral also a square?
|129|170
As it is twice the thickness of the original square
is this a proof that the new square is half the
&
area of the first square?
Now, we move on to a hexagon.
194] 149/112] 83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90 |123|164
1951150113
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
196 | 151
114
122 | 163
152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161
197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 2071
.
162
|
Figure 2
There are two routes; either cut and
It is worth cutting out the hexagon, but looking at
the two images in Figure 4, is it possible to agree
that the triangle in the first picture is half the area
of the hexagon and, by drawing in some extra
;
A
:
triangles in the second figure that the smaller
.. OF,
hexagon is % of the triangle, so the smaller
Does this work with other pairs of twin primes?
hexagon is % of /2 of the larger one. For the
hexagon the fraction is YA.
These are two questions that may be worth
working on at this point.
Cutting out and folding gives a very different feel
to this ‘proof’
November 2013
www.atm.org.uk
Pagina 4
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)Figure 4a
After working on these two regular
The task is then to find the ratio of the three
polygons consider the table in Figure 4b;
sides in the triangle in the top right hand corner,
Sides of regular
Ratio of areas
polygon
http://nrich.maths.org/700 - so, if you are familiar
up to the point one third of the way from the left
A half
hand end along the top, and search for the ratio
of the three sides on that new triangle.
9
6
a problem posed by NRICH — go to Napkin fold,
with that task fold the bottom right hand corner
3
4
as shown in Figure 6. | am conscious that this is
A third
Before reading on it would be sensible to work
on both these tasks.
fi
Some results are shown in Figure 7.
8
9
Distance from
left hand end
10
Figure 4b
Triangle
Y
3,4,5
4 along the top
There seem to be some questions here.
Y
5, 12,13
12 along the top
In particular, ‘what could be a fraction for the
Y
7,24,25
24 along the top
pentagon?’
Ve
9,40,41
24 along the top
3,4,5
3alongthetop
One reason for asking about the pentagon is
And so on
that the Pythagoreans used the pentagram
as a symbol to recognize each other. | have
But also for 24
no idea why, but one conjecture might be that
they saw this as an unfinished task that real
mathematicians were working on — the ratio of
the smaller red pentagon to the larger one.
Figure 7
The final entry raises the question, what fraction
will give 5, 12, 13 the other way around?, ... that
is 5 along the top. An astonishing fact, for me, is
that there is a Pythagorean triple associated with
every rational fraction along the top and viceversa. There is also a wonderful connecting idea
between the 3,4,5; the 5,12,13; the 7, 24,25 ...
... and Pythagoras’ work on classical notes and
fractions along a string.
Figure 5
Pythagorean triples
Because Pythagoras was in the title of this piece,
More work with a square
| think it is time to look at;
Take a new square of paper. Mark the middle of
3? + 4? = 5?
the top, and then fold one of the bottom corners
What is the next Pythagorean triple that springs
up to that point, see Figure 6
immediately to mind?
10
Mathematics Teaching 237 Journal of the Association of Teachers of Mathematics
ltd
ge
m
4
PA
A
«i g.ù
ee
Pagina 5
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)At Conference 2013 there were various
responses, but no-one suggested
202 + 212 = 292, which is the one that | would like
to place immediately under 3,4,5.
My reason for going to this triple next is that
(20,21,29) is the next ‘most square’ rectangle
with an integer diagonal. This raises the
question; what is the next most square integer
sided rectangle with an integer diagonal length?
And the next? .... Development on this idea can
Around a circle of radius 2 there is clearly 6,8,10,
twice 3,4,5 and, from the work that has just
been done, 5,12,13. But, it is also possible to
put two Pythagorean triangles together, either
overlapping, or side-by-side, to form a new
triangle with integer sides and an in-circle whose
radius we can find.
As, for instance, in Figure 9
be found, in this edition of MT, as a separate
article entitled Folding a Square, Page 29.
In-circles
Figure 9
Returning to the idea of working with circles
‘Imagine a horizontal line and cut it with a vertical
line to make two corners, one above and one
below.’ Now take a circle with radius one and
push it gently into the top corner. Take a second
The 6, 25, 29 triangle can be seen as a 20, 21,29
triangle with a 15, 20, 25 triangle removed.
circle, radius two, and push it into the corner
below the horizontal line. Lean a line against the
two circles to make a triangle. See Figure 8.
\
There is a piece of bookwork in the A-level
syllabus, from many years ago, and | have just
found a use for it! The bookwork states that:
In any triangle the connection between radius of
the in-circle and area of the triangle, with sides a,
b, c is given by...
Asrs
where A = area of the triangle,
r = radius of the in-circle
and
s = semi perimeter = /2 (a + b + c)
The image for this is shown in Figure 10
/
Figure 8
Find the lengths of the sides of the triangle.
It would be helpful to work on this task before
reading on.
As delegates found a solution they felt at ease
with, | asked them to look at a similar diagram
with circles of radius 2 and 3, then 3 and 4, ...,
and so on.
After a little work | suggested that although
there are an infinity of triangles around a unit
circle | now know that there is only one integer
triangle around the unit circle and this is the right
angle 3,4,5 triangle. Algebra feels to be a heavy
approach to proving this uniqueness. Are there
any geometric proofs?
Figure 10
... from which it is reasonable to write that
A = à” ua PL + Si
where ris the radius of the in-circle. The formula
follows.
A consequence of putting this formula together
with the half-base-times-height formula for the
area of a triangle is that the only integer sided
triangles, with an integer length in-circle radius,
must also have a rational height.
November 2013
www.atm.org.uk
Pagina 6
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)The reasoning for this is as follows.
A =rxs=axh
lf, rx
S=axhwe require r, s, anda... all to be
integers, or at least rational, so h must also be
an integer, or rational. If h is rational then it lies
on a grid point and the Pythagorean triangle is
assured. From this the in-circle in the 6, 25,29
triangle has radius 2.
| know that there is only one integer triangle
around the unit circle. This is presented as an
assertion and the proof is left to the reader!.
| would like to pass on a ‘wondering’ from Alan
Beardon ‘/s there anything known about integer
triangles round a circle of radius 27
Figure 12
The three red circles show a way of accessing
Having had a number of e-mail exchanges with
the connections between a 3, 4, 5 triangle and
John Mason after conference we have five
the associated in-circle. But, standing back, it
different integer triangles round a radius 2, but
is clear that if this triangle tessellates the plane,
sorting out that this is all of them... is another
which it does, then it should be possible to pack
matter entirely. This is left open as work in
the plane with circles of radius one, two and
progress.
three. This is a dynamic geometry task that,
at conference, | left open to be worked on in
Proving the uniqueness of the 3,4,5 triangle
workshop time.
around the unit circle is a more straightforward
task.
Ratio in three dimensions
Multiple in-circles
When you elect to set hares running at the start
of a conference there are always choices to be
| cannot resist showing this image next.
made.
| decided that there was time for one further
activity. Unfortunately, | needed to set the activity
up using some introductory ideas.
| wanted to work on the ancient Greek geometric
challenge of constructing an altar that is just
twice the volume of an existing altar. In traditional
ruler-and-compass work this is impossible, but
by using some of the ideas from origami, and
looking in the ATM publication, ‘Ideas for 6* Form
Mathematics’, as a starting point, much of this is
Figure 11
Here we have a 3,4,5 triangle with an incircle of
radius one, and the other three circles, which
touch all three sides of the triangle, having radii,
two, three and six. So, a perfect result 1,2,3,6
and1+2+3=6. It leaves me
conjecturing about 28, (1, 2, 4, 7,14) the next
perfect number, and what the dimensions of an
associated right angle triangle might be?
Tessellation
Figure 12 shows another way of looking at the
3,4,5 triangle.
12
opened up.
| started by folding pieces of A4 paper into
a cylinder in two different ways. In the first
approach | joined the long lengths together to
produce one cylinder, and as second approach
by joining the short lengths to produce a different
cylinder.
Holding up the two cylinders | asked; which of
these containers would hold the most Maltesers?
In a straw-poll most delegates believed the ‘more
squat’ cylinder would hold the most, but there
were a few votes for ‘the same’, and one or two
for the taller cylinder as holding the most.
Mathematics Teaching 237 Journal of the Association of Teachers of Mathematics
Pagina 7
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)And finally
A possible different second line under 1 + 2 = 3
Instead of writing 4 + 5 + 6 underneath would it be
possible to start with 2 and the next line starting with 3
Sowe get
2+3+4=4+5
3+ 4+5+6=5+6+7
Readers might like to work on the samenessses and
differences between the infinity suggested by these
three and the three at the start of this article.
| creased both cylinders so that each was now a
square based prism, and asked; will this special
case preserve the ratio of the ‘volumes’ between
the two paper models?
References
Ideas for 6th Form Mathematics, ATM
Resources
Linked to this article there are a number of resources
on-line. www.atm.org.uk/mt237
Instructions for making a brick from a square
A list of activities for delegates at conference following
Geoff's plenary.
Other Resources
The following are web-based sources that | regret
were not included in the opening conference plenary
because of time restrictions.
Part of Bronowski from Ascent of Man that deals with
Pythagoras theorem (BBC) https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=mOvpVOCuEdc
| left the task, knowing that the side lengths were
... Or you can see the whole episode
in the ratio 1:V2, for finding the volume ratio, but
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IENM8u47zsl&play
suggested that cutting a large square in half to
next=1&list=PL9D6C6564285AFD14
get a pair of rectangles with lengths in the ratio
Donald in Mathmagicland — golden section piece
1:2 might be a special case that could provide
insight into the first, two cylinders task, maybe
http://www. youtube.com/watch?v=D5n6iT2Aaqrl
generalising along a chain of specialisations.
... or the whole film
| next produced a brick folded from a large
http://www. youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&N
square. Then, | unfolded the brick to show the
creases. | decided to finish the session with
this challenge; is it possible to find the side of a
square that will fold to make a brick of half the
R=18v=nav0kVa66xk
Archimedes volume of a sphere
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/Archimedes.
shtml
volume of the original brick?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giUk9leseBs
For instructions on how to fold, and produce, the
brick go to www.atm.org.uk/mt237.
There are two DVDs | often use with primary learners,
although | did not do so on with the group | worked
with prior to conference
The dot and the line Norton Juster'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgqUya0kGPA
The Phantom Tollboth
Geoff Faux
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Llg5VODW6n4
November 2013
www.atm.org.uk
Pagina 8
Bekijk in PDF(opent in een nieuw venster)Copyright of Mathematics Teaching is the property of Association of Teachers of
Mathematics and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a
listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use.